Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

KKR is systematically running AI diagnostics and experiments across its ~250 portfolio companies. Despite this comprehensive approach, the firm's honest assessment is that AI currently provides helpful, incremental gains rather than the massive transformations often hyped in the press.

Related Insights

New McKinsey research reveals a significant AI adoption gap. While 88% of organizations use AI, nearly two-thirds haven't scaled it beyond pilots, meaning they are not behind their peers. This explains why only 39% report enterprise-level EBIT impact. True high-performers succeed by fundamentally redesigning workflows, not just experimenting.

Companies are overcomplicating AI's role. It's not magic that alters basic business principles. It's simply a new tool to apply within the existing equation of applying a resource to a problem and measuring the outcome. The fundamentals of value delivery and measurement remain unchanged.

Companies claim AI is revolutionary for productivity, yet economic studies, including one by OpenAI itself, show no correlation between spending on AI and increased revenue per employee. The hype about transformative efficiency is not reflected in actual economic output.

Adopting AI hasn't changed core business metrics like growth or retention. Its true value is in operational efficiency, allowing teams to analyze data more deeply. AI provides the ability to explore 'second and third level questions' and investigate previously inaccessible KPIs, improving the *how* without altering the *what*.

Contrary to expectations, even cutting-edge companies are not yet using AI to automate internal operations. Their best talent and resources are focused on the larger prize of building new AI-driven products, leaving internal efficiency as a latent, uncaptured opportunity for now.

KKR leverages its 250+ portfolio companies as a massive R&D grid for AI. By running diagnostics and mandating experiments at each company, they test dozens of vendors and applications simultaneously. This allows them to identify successful combinations of vendor, application, and industry, which are then scaled portfolio-wide.

While many firms are just now reacting to AI's impact, major credit investors like KKR have been actively underwriting AI-driven business model risk for nearly six years. This proactive, long-term approach to assessing technological disruption is a core part of their due diligence process, not a recent development.

Private equity firms are aggressively implementing AI across thousands of their portfolio companies. This isn't just for efficiency; it's a strategy to boost profitability and make these companies, particularly struggling SaaS businesses, more attractive for exit in a tough market. This creates a massive, real-world testbed for enterprise AI.

There is a significant gap between how companies talk about using AI and their actual implementation. While many leaders claim to be "AI-driven," real-world application is often limited to superficial tasks like social media content, not deep, transformative integration into core business processes.

Recent surveys suggest AI is underperforming, but the data reveals a stark divide. The 12% of companies that deeply embed AI into core processes are 3x more likely to see both cost reduction and revenue growth, creating a significant and compounding advantage over the majority who attempt superficial adoption.