Companies feel immense pressure to integrate AI to stay competitive, leading to massive spending. However, this rush means they lack the infrastructure to measure ROI, creating a paradox of anxious investment without clear proof of value.

The conventional wisdom that enterprises are blocked by a lack of clean, accessible data is wrong. The true bottleneck is people and change management. Scrappy teams can derive significant value from existing, imperfect internal and public data; the real challenge is organizational inertia and process redesign.

Focusing on AI for cost savings yields incremental gains. The transformative value comes from rethinking entire workflows to drive top-line growth. This is achieved by either delivering a service much faster or by expanding a high-touch service to a vastly larger audience ("do more").

Most companies use AI for optimization—making existing processes faster and cheaper. The greater opportunity is innovation: using AI to create entirely new forms of value. This "10x thinking" is critical for growth, especially as pure efficiency gains will ultimately lead to a reduced need for human workers.

Enterprises struggle to get value from AI due to a lack of iterative, data-science expertise. The winning model for AI companies isn't just selling APIs, but embedding "forward deployment" teams of engineers and scientists to co-create solutions, closing the gap between prototype and production value.

An "optimization-execution gap" reveals that while 96% of CMOs prioritize AI, only 65% make meaningful investments. This lack of commitment leaves teams stuck in an experimentation phase, preventing the deep workflow integration needed for significant productivity gains.

The main barrier to AI's impact is not its technical flaws but the fact that most organizations don't understand what it can actually do. Advanced features like 'deep research' and reasoning models remain unused by over 95% of professionals, leaving immense potential and competitive advantage untapped.

Headlines about high AI pilot failure rates are misleading because it's incredibly easy to start a project, inflating the denominator of attempts. Robust, successful AI implementations are happening, but they require 6-12 months of serious effort, not the quick wins promised by hype cycles.

To get mainstream users to adopt AI, you can't ask them to learn a new workflow. The key is to integrate AI capabilities directly into the tools and processes they already use. AI should augment their current job, not feel like a separate, new task they have to perform.