The oil industry's boom-bust cycle is self-perpetuating. Low prices cause companies to slash investment and lead to a talent drain as workers leave the volatile sector. This underinvestment, combined with natural production declines, inevitably leads to tighter markets and price spikes years later.

Despite healthy global oil demand, J.P. Morgan maintains a bearish outlook because supply is forecast to expand at three times the rate of demand. This oversupply creates such a large market imbalance that prices must fall to enforce production cuts and rebalance the market.

Contrary to bearish sentiment, oil demand has consistently exceeded expectations. The market's weakness stems from a supply glut, primarily from the Americas, which has outpaced demand growth by more than twofold, leading to a structural surplus and significant inventory builds.

The crude oil market is trapped in a recurring monthly pattern. For the first half of each month, the forward curve weakens on fears of a supply glut, nearly flipping into contango. Then, a sudden geopolitical shock mid-month causes the curve to snap back into pronounced backwardation, delaying the surplus.

The inflationary impact of tariffs and anti-migration policies is just starting. Businesses and migrants face complex, irreversible decisions that create a year-long lag before supply shocks and price increases become visible in the broader economy.

The impact of an oil supply disruption on price is a convex function of its duration. A short-term closure results in delayed deliveries with minimal price effect, while a prolonged one exhausts storage and requires triple-digit prices to force demand destruction and rebalance the market.

The economic impact of higher oil prices can be quantified: every sustained $10 increase per barrel costs US consumers $3 billion over a year. The recent $30 spike, if it holds, translates to a $90 billion direct cost to consumers, primarily through higher gas prices.

While many fear production shutdowns, a more significant and probable risk is a logistical shock from shipping disruptions. Even modest delays in tanker transit times could effectively remove millions of barrels per day from the market, causing a significant price spike without a single well being shut down.

It's the volatility and unpredictability within the supply chain environment—rather than the magnitude of a single shock—that can dramatically amplify the inflationary effects of other events, like energy price spikes. This suggests central banks need situation-specific responses.