Unlike digital assets, perpetual futures are fundamentally incompatible with markets for physical goods like livestock or grain. The model breaks down because a contract that never expires cannot accommodate the essential mechanism of making or taking physical delivery, a core function of these traditional futures markets.

Speculation is often maligned as mere gambling, but it is a critical component for price discovery, liquidity, and risk transfer in any healthy financial market. Without speculators, markets would be inefficient. Prediction markets are an explicit tool to harness this power for accurate forecasting.

Unlike past bull runs where price hikes spurred developer interest and new products, the latest surge was driven by external factors like ETFs and meme coins. These offered little for builders to innovate on, thus 'dislocating' the traditional price-innovation feedback loop.

The 24/7 nature of perpetual futures (“perps”) is attractive to traditional markets for assets like the S&P 500. This shift requires 24/7 settlement infrastructure, making stablecoins essential collateral and creating a massive, non-speculative demand driver for them.

While both involve risk, prediction markets like Polymarket allow for bets on real-world events where an individual can have a genuine analytical edge. This contrasts with the uninformed, "degenerate" speculation common in meme coins, offering a potentially more rational outlet for risk capital.

Rapid, massive price swings in crypto are often caused by the liquidation of highly leveraged perpetual futures ("perps"). When many leveraged short positions are wiped out, it forces a cascade of buying that creates an artificial price spike, a dynamic less about market belief and more about financial mechanics.

Creating synthetic derivatives (like perpetual futures) of traditional assets on-chain is more scalable and efficient than creating direct tokenized copies. This is especially true for assets with high derivative demand, such as emerging market equities.

The founder of DEX Leiter notes a critical market failure: after FTX's collapse, trading volume didn't migrate to decentralized exchanges. This implies the product-market fit of DEXs is so bad that users would rather accept a significant risk of total loss from fraud on a centralized platform than use the available decentralized products.

The success of protocols like Hyperliquid proves product-market fit for on-chain derivatives. This attracts new competitors who use zero-fee models and airdrops to steal market share, forcing a race to the bottom on fees until only one dominant player remains and can re-introduce them.