The US corporate market is 75% financed by capital markets, while Europe's is ~80% bank-financed. This structural inversion means Europe is undergoing a long-term, multi-decade shift toward institutional lending, creating a sustained tailwind for private credit growth that is far from mature.

Success in community bank investing doesn't require complex esoteric analysis. It boils down to four key metrics: high capital levels (equity-to-assets), low non-performing assets (under 2%), stable or growing book value, and a low price-to-tangible book value (under 85%).

Contrary to the perception that alternatives are complex, their core business models are often simpler than many public market instruments. The concept of direct lending (loaning money and collecting interest) is more straightforward for a retail investor to grasp than the mechanics of a structured note sold by a bank with embedded options.

During a crisis, equity and loan portfolios can become completely illiquid. However, currency liquidity almost never disappears. Therefore, a deep capability in FX instruments is the most critical risk management tool for an EM investor, allowing them to hedge when other markets are closed.

David Kaiser reveals his model specifically limits exposure to financial stocks. Because financials frequently screen cheap on metrics like price-to-book, a pure value model can become dangerously over-concentrated in the sector. The limit is a pragmatic override to ensure diversification and avoid the unique, often hidden risks inherent in banks.

The US banking system is technologically behind countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America. This inefficiency stems from a protected regulatory environment that fosters a status quo. In contrast, markets like the UK have implemented fintech-friendly charters, enabling innovators like Revolut to thrive.

Despite being at historically tight levels, EM sovereign credit spreads are unlikely to widen significantly from an EM-specific slowdown. The catalyst for a major sell-off would have to be a 'beta move' originating from a crisis in core US markets, such as equities or corporate credit, given the current strength of EM fundamentals.

Large European banks are not absent from lending, but they prefer the simplicity and regulatory ease of large, portfolio-level financing over complex, single-company underwriting. This strategic focus leaves a significant funding gap in the €100-€400M facility size range for private credit funds to fill.

In emerging markets, where 'six sigma' events happen frequently, statistical risk models like Value at Risk are ineffective. A more robust approach is scenario analysis, stress-testing portfolios against specific historical crises like 1998 or 2008 to understand true vulnerabilities.