In categories like customer support, where AI can handle the vast majority of queries, charging per human agent ('per seat') no longer makes sense. The business model is shifting to be outcome-based, where customers pay for the value delivered, such as per ticket resolved or per successful interaction.

SaaS companies often use the traditional top-down sales funnel as their mental model. However, this model is fundamentally flawed because it ends at the 'close' and completely ignores the recurring revenue component, which is the lifeblood of SaaS. The 'bow tie' model is a more accurate representation.

Standard SaaS pricing fails for agentic products because high usage becomes a cost center. Avoid the trap of profiting from non-use. Instead, implement a hybrid model with a fixed base and usage-based overages, or, ideally, tie pricing directly to measurable outcomes generated by the AI.

Investors and acquirers pay premiums for predictable revenue, which comes from retaining and upselling existing customers. This "expansion revenue" is a far greater value multiplier than simply acquiring new customers, a metric most founders wrongly prioritize.

The dominant per-user-per-month SaaS business model is becoming obsolete for AI-native companies. The new standard is consumption or outcome-based pricing. Customers will pay for the specific task an AI completes or the value it generates, not for a seat license, fundamentally changing how software is sold.

Instead of absorbing labor and commission costs, a service business can bundle them into customer-facing "bin" and "initiation" fees. This shifts the financial burden of acquisition to the new customer, allowing the business to collect enough cash upfront to cover all costs and become immediately cash-flow positive on each new sale.

For owners planning a future exit, the MSP model is far superior to a reseller's project-to-project structure. The stable, predictable monthly recurring revenue (MRR) from multi-year contracts is highly attractive to investors, creating a sellable asset independent of the owner's sales prowess.

Your ability to acquire more customers isn't just about lowering acquisition costs. It's fundamentally limited by how much gross profit each customer generates. Increasing a customer's worth directly enables you to spend more to acquire new ones, creating a powerful growth loop.

The 4% fee on ChatGPT's checkout isn't comparable to ad spend because it doesn't grant merchants a long-term customer relationship. With restrictions on remarketing, it's a simple transaction cost that erodes margins, not an investment in acquiring a customer with future lifetime value (LTV).