The public's frustration with affordability stems from a psychological disconnect. While wages have risen to match higher prices, people perceive the inflation surge as an unfair loss, failing to connect it to their own income gains. This creates a political challenge where economic data and public sentiment diverge.
Related Insights
Political messaging that touts positive macroeconomic indicators like GDP growth is ineffective when citizens feel financial pressure. People vote based on their personal budgets and daily costs, making abstract economic reports a "terrible bumper sticker" and a losing campaign strategy.
The disconnect between strong GDP data and public dissatisfaction (the 'vibe-cession') is because wealth gains are concentrated at the top while median outcomes worsen. This K-shaped dynamic is politically unsustainable, forcing politicians away from supply-side policies and toward more populist, and often inflationary, measures.
Aggregate economic data looks positive because the top 10% of households drive consumption. However, the bottom 90% are experiencing financial distress, which is reflected in negative consumer sentiment. The 'average' consumer experience doesn't exist, leading to a disconnect between official statistics and public perception.
Despite headline economic growth, the bottom 80% of U.S. households have seen their spending power stagnate since before the pandemic. Their spending has grown at exactly the rate of inflation, meaning their real consumption hasn't increased. This data explains the widespread public dissatisfaction with the economy.
While wage data may contradict a crisis, people feel poorer because happiness equals prosperity minus expectations. Social media massively inflates expectations by normalizing the lifestyle of the top 0.1%, causing widespread feelings of financial failure.
Despite official CPI averaging under 2% from 2010-2020, the actual cost of major assets like homes and stocks exploded. This disconnect shows that government inflation data fails to reflect the reality of eroding purchasing power, which is a key driver of public frustration.
Official inflation metrics (rate of change) are meaningless to the public. People feel the pain of absolute price levels versus their stagnant wages, creating a disconnect that fuels widespread economic apathy and anger, regardless of what government data says.
Official inflation metrics may be low, but public perception remains negative because wages haven't kept pace with the *cumulative* price increases since the pandemic. Consumers feel a "permanent price increase" on essential goods like groceries, making them feel poorer even if the rate of new inflation has slowed.
The administration's reactive approach to affordability targets specific, highly visible price increases (e.g., eggs, cars) rather than broad inflation data. This is because consumer sentiment is heavily influenced by the sticker shock of everyday items, which takes a long time to fade, even after inflation rates cool.
Data shows Millennials and Gen Z have higher real wages than previous generations at the same age. Their economic anxiety stems from a perceived lack of clear career paths and a "vibe-cession" fueled by social media, not necessarily from worse economic data.
