Former journalist Natalie Brunell reveals her investigative stories were sometimes killed to avoid upsetting influential people. This highlights a systemic bias that protects incumbents at the expense of public transparency, reinforcing the need for decentralized information sources.
When promoting Bitcoin, author Natalie Brunell intentionally avoids criticizing other cryptocurrencies. This "pro-Bitcoin, not anti-crypto" stance prevents unproductive debates and antagonism, keeping the focus on the positive aspects of her chosen solution for a broader audience.
The conversation about Bitcoin's energy usage often misses a key point. The network doesn't just consume energy; it actively encourages developing underutilized energy sources by monetizing stranded or wasted energy, driving innovation toward a more energy-abundant world.
Natalie Brunell's book is effective because it dedicates its first half to explaining flaws in the financial system. This strategy resonates with people who feel something is wrong but don't understand the root cause, making them more receptive to a solution like Bitcoin later.
Despite official CPI averaging under 2% from 2010-2020, the actual cost of major assets like homes and stocks exploded. This disconnect shows that government inflation data fails to reflect the reality of eroding purchasing power, which is a key driver of public frustration.
Brunell's passion for fixing the financial system is rooted in watching her hardworking immigrant parents lose everything in the 2008 crisis. This personal experience of the American Dream being a "rug pull" fuels her mission to find and promote a fair alternative like Bitcoin.
Strategic military planning, which looks decades into the future, is still based on a 2% inflation target. This is a critical flaw, as even slightly higher sustained inflation will drastically cut the real budget, severely limiting the military's ability to procure equipment and maintain readiness.
The U.S. military's power is no longer backed by a robust domestic industrial base. Decades of offshoring have made it dependent on rivals like China for critical minerals and manufacturing. This means the country can no longer sustain a prolonged conflict, a reality its defense planners ignore.