While reading great literature is essential, analyzing poorly written books can be a more effective learning tool for writers. The flaws in craft are more visible, allowing an aspiring writer to deconstruct the mechanics of storytelling and see how a narrative works (or doesn't).
A mentor isn't someone who provides step-by-step instructions. The most powerful learning comes from finding someone you admire and closely observing their every move, how they speak, and how they behave in the face of obstacles, rather than seeking direct guidance.
In writing 'The 99% Invisible City,' one author focused on including the best possible individual stories, while the co-author prioritized ensuring they fit into a cohesive book structure. This creative tension forced them to justify each inclusion and resulted in a stronger, more balanced final product.
When faced with overwhelming research (290,000 words), author James Nestor found clarity by structuring his book around a simple, 20-day personal experiment. This narrative "through-line" provided a skeleton to hang complex topics on, making the book engaging and coherent.
A contrarian take on learning suggests that non-fiction books are an inefficient use of time. A single, hour-long podcast interview with the author can often distill 80% of the book's core concepts. For busy professionals, this is a massive time-saving heuristic for acquiring new knowledge, reserving deep reading for only the most essential topics.
A coherent picture of a person is built from heterogeneous, often contradictory, elements. Readers find this more convincing because it mirrors real life; everyone we know is contradictory. Instead of forcing a simple narrative, revealing inconsistencies makes a character feel more authentic and human.
The most effective way to convey complex information, even in data-heavy fields, is through compelling stories. People remember narratives far longer than they remember statistics or formulas. For author Morgan Housel, this became a survival mechanism to differentiate his writing and communicate more effectively.
Grisham rejects the "write a messy first draft" advice. He meticulously outlines and revises daily to avoid writing into dead ends. This "basher" method saves time by ensuring the story is sound from the start, a lesson learned after cutting a year's worth of work from his first novel.
A story's core mechanic for engagement is not just emotion, but the constant betrayal of the audience's expectations. People are drawn to narratives, jokes, and songs precisely because they want their predictions about what happens next to be wrong. This element of surprise is what makes a story satisfying and compels an audience to continue.
Instead of aiming for a perfect AI-generated first draft, use it as a tool to overcome writer's block. When feeling unmotivated, ask an AI to produce an initial version. The often-flawed or "terrible" output can provide the necessary energy and motivation for a human writer to jump in and improve it.
Instead of striving for perfection, the key to overcoming creative blocks is to allow yourself to create subpar work. Acknowledging that 80-90% of an initial draft will be discarded lowers the stakes and makes it easier to begin the creative process.