Upon returning as CEO, David Cohen implemented a 'better is better, not bigger is better' philosophy at Techstars. This strategic shift prioritizes improving the quality of the investment offer, selection process, and founder experience over simply increasing the number of companies funded. It's a crucial lesson for any organization that risks mistaking sheer growth for progress.
Related Insights
Many late-stage investors focus heavily on data and metrics, forgetting that the quality of the leadership team remains as critical as in the seed stage. A new CEO, for example, can completely pivot a large company and reignite growth, a factor that quantitative analysis often misses.
Premira's value creation aims to produce 'better' companies, defined by higher quality revenue and faster growth rates at exit than at entry, even at a larger scale. This involves strategic shifts like moving to a cloud model or significant geographic expansion.
According to Techstars' CEO David Cohen, standout AI companies are defined by their leadership. The CEO must personally embody an "AI-first" mindset, constantly thinking about leverage and efficiency from day one. It's not enough to simply lead a team of engineers who understand AI; the strategic vision must originate from the top.
VCs at the highest level don't just write checks; they fundamentally reset a founder's aspirations. By placing a startup in the lineage of giants like Google and Oracle, they shift the goal from building a big business to creating a generational company.
To maintain quality and individual attention, Techstars scales its accelerator model by launching programs in new cities worldwide rather than increasing the size of existing cohorts. Keeping classes small (8-10 companies) allows for deep engagement from the local mentor community, a model that prioritizes depth over breadth in a single location.
Techstars founder David Cohen attributes the success of their most exceptional programs, some producing multiple unicorns from a single cohort, directly to the quality and dedication of the individual Managing Director. This highlights that in venture, the person on the ground leading the program is far more critical than the overarching brand or process.
David Cohen observes that founders who are inherently frugal or "stingy" with capital—spending only when absolutely necessary—often achieve better outcomes. This mindset, focused on capital preservation and efficiency, is a more powerful indicator of success than simply raising large rounds to fuel growth, a trait he has seen in his own entrepreneurial career.
The hardest transition from entrepreneur to investor is curbing the instinct to solve problems and imagine "what could be." The best venture deals aren't about fixing a company but finding teams already on a trajectory to succeed, then helping change the slope of that success line on the margin.
Competing to be a founder's "first call" is a crowded, zero-sum game. A more effective strategy is to be the "second call"—the specialist a founder turns to for a specific, difficult problem after consulting their lead investor. This positioning is more scalable, collaborative, and allows for differentiated value-add.
Venture capital should focus on what a founder does exceptionally well, rather than penalizing them for past failures or weaknesses. Ben Horowitz uses the Adam Neumann example to illustrate their principle: judge people by their spectacular talents (like building the WeWork brand) and help them manage their flaws, which is a more effective strategy than seeking perfectly flawless individuals.
