Unprofitable AI models mirror Uber's early strategy. By subsidizing services, they integrate into workflows and create dependency. Once users rely on the tool (e.g., a law firm replacing an associate), prices can be increased dramatically to reflect the massive value created, ultimately achieving profitability.
Related Insights
Instead of pre-negotiating revenue splits, Uber's CEO proposes allowing AI companies to integrate for free initially. This "experience first, economics later" approach prioritizes proving user value and measuring customer incrementality before determining a take rate. It’s a strategy focused on innovation speed over immediate monetization.
Traditional SaaS companies are trapped by their per-seat pricing model. Their own AI agents, if successful, would reduce the number of human seats needed, cannibalizing their core revenue. AI-native startups exploit this by using value-based pricing (e.g., tasks completed), aligning their success with customer automation goals.
OpenAI's path to profitability isn't just selling subscriptions. The strategy is to create a "team of helpers" within ChatGPT to replace expensive human services. The bet is that users will pay significantly for an AI that can act as their personal shopper, travel agent, and financial advisor, unlocking massive new markets.
While OpenAI's projected losses dwarf those of past tech giants, the strategic goal is similar to Uber's: spend aggressively to achieve market dominance. If OpenAI becomes the definitive "front door to AI," the enormous upfront investment could be justified by the value of that monopoly position.
Standard SaaS pricing fails for agentic products because high usage becomes a cost center. Avoid the trap of profiting from non-use. Instead, implement a hybrid model with a fixed base and usage-based overages, or, ideally, tie pricing directly to measurable outcomes generated by the AI.
In rapidly evolving AI markets, founders should prioritize user acquisition and market share over achieving positive unit economics. The core assumption is that underlying model costs will decrease exponentially, making current negative margins an acceptable short-term trade-off for long-term growth.
![Jesse Zhang - Building Decagon - [Invest Like the Best, EP.443] thumbnail](https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/2cc4da2a-a266-11f0-ac41-9f5060c6f4ef/image/7df6dc347b875d4b90ae98f397bf1cb1.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&max-w=3000&max-h=3000&fit=crop&auto=format,compress)
The most durable AI applications are those that directly amplify their customers' revenue streams rather than merely offering efficiency gains. For businesses with non-hourly billing models, like contingency-based law firms, AI that helps them win more cases is infinitely more valuable and defensible than AI that just saves time.
In the age of AI, software is shifting from a tool that assists humans to an agent that completes tasks. The pricing model should reflect this. Instead of a subscription for access (a license), charge for the value created when the AI successfully achieves a business outcome.
Previously, building 'just a feature' was a flawed strategy. Now, an AI feature that replaces a human role (e.g., a receptionist) can command a high enough price to be a viable company wedge, even before it becomes a full product.
An emerging AI growth strategy involves using expensive frontier models to acquire users and distribution at an explosive rate, accepting poor initial margins. Once critical mass is reached, the company introduces its own fine-tuned, cheaper model, drastically improving unit economics overnight and capitalizing on the established user base.
