CEOs of platforms like ZocDoc and TaskRabbit are not worried about AI agent disruption. They believe the immense complexity of managing their real-world networks—like integrating with chaotic healthcare systems or vetting thousands of workers—is a defensible moat that pure software agents cannot easily replicate, giving them leverage over AI companies.
Instead of pre-negotiating revenue splits, Uber's CEO proposes allowing AI companies to integrate for free initially. This "experience first, economics later" approach prioritizes proving user value and measuring customer incrementality before determining a take rate. It’s a strategy focused on innovation speed over immediate monetization.
Perplexity's legal defense against Amazon's lawsuit reframes its AI agent not as a scraper bot, but as a direct extension of the user. By arguing "software is becoming labor," it claims the agent inherits the user's permissions to access websites. This novel legal argument fundamentally challenges the enforceability of current terms of service in the age of AI.
Service company CEOs believe strong brand loyalty is their primary defense against the "DoorDash Problem." Lyft's CEO argues that users are more likely to ask an AI specifically for "a Lyft" rather than a generic "ride." They are investing in brand to ensure they are requested by name, preventing them from being disintermediated and reduced to the cheapest commodity option.
The "DoorDash Problem" posits that AI agents could reduce service platforms like Uber and Airbnb to mere commodity providers. By abstracting away the user interface, agents eliminate crucial revenue streams like ads, loyalty programs, and upsells. This shifts the customer relationship to the AI, eroding the core business model of the App Store economy's biggest winners.
Unlike service platforms like Uber that rely on real-world networks, Amazon's high-margin ad business is existentially threatened by AI agents that bypass sponsored listings. This vulnerability explains its uniquely aggressive legal stance against Perplexity, as it stands to lose a massive, growing revenue stream if users stop interacting directly with its site.