Traditional SaaS companies are trapped by their per-seat pricing model. Their own AI agents, if successful, would reduce the number of human seats needed, cannibalizing their core revenue. AI-native startups exploit this by using value-based pricing (e.g., tasks completed), aligning their success with customer automation goals.

Satya Nadella suggests a fundamental shift in enterprise software monetization. As autonomous AI agents become prevalent, the value unit will move from the human user ("per seat") to the AI itself. "Agents are the new seats," signaling a future where companies pay for automated tasks and outcomes, not just software access for employees.

AI startups should choose their pricing model based on a 2x2 matrix of autonomy (human-in-the-loop vs. fully automated) and attribution (how clearly its value can be measured). Low levels lead to seat-based pricing, while high levels of both unlock outcome-based models.

Initially, Astronomer priced against the cost of hiring an engineer for analytics tasks. As customers adopted Airflow for critical operational workloads (e.g., regulatory reporting), the pricing conversation shifted. The value is no longer saving a salary, but preventing catastrophic revenue or compliance failures.

Standard SaaS pricing fails for agentic products because high usage becomes a cost center. Avoid the trap of profiting from non-use. Instead, implement a hybrid model with a fixed base and usage-based overages, or, ideally, tie pricing directly to measurable outcomes generated by the AI.

The dominant per-user-per-month SaaS business model is becoming obsolete for AI-native companies. The new standard is consumption or outcome-based pricing. Customers will pay for the specific task an AI completes or the value it generates, not for a seat license, fundamentally changing how software is sold.

The current moment is ripe for building new horizontal software giants due to three converging paradigm shifts: a move to outcome-based pricing, AI completing end-to-end tasks as the new unit of value, and a shift from structured schemas to dynamic, unstructured data models.

Unlike high-margin SaaS, AI agents operate on thin 30-40% gross margins. This financial reality makes traditional seat-based pricing obsolete. To build a viable business, companies must create new systems to capture more revenue and manage agent costs effectively, ensuring profitability and growth from day one.

Intercom priced its AI agent per successful resolution, aligning its incentives with customers. Though initially losing money on each resolution ($1.21 cost vs 99¢ price), efficiency gains made it profitable, proving outcome-based pricing can succeed for AI products.