When a team is struggling, a micromanager gives the answer. An effective hands-on leader resists making the decision. Instead, they intervene to teach the team the correct *method* for arriving at the decision, thereby improving the organization's long-term capabilities.

A leader's job doesn't end after designing a process. They must actively and continuously teach and reinforce the company's methods, especially as new people join. The goal is to ensure the right things happen even when the leader isn't present.

Effective long-term leadership isn't static; it's an 'accordion' that flexes between deep involvement and granting autonomy. This adaptive approach is key for different company seasons, knowing when to lean into details and when to empower the team to make 'foot fault' mistakes and learn.

The transition from a hands-on contributor to a leader is one of the hardest professional shifts. It requires consciously moving away from execution by learning to trust and delegate. This is achieved by hiring talented people and then empowering them to operate, even if it means simply getting out of their way.

The best leaders don't just stay high-level. They retain the ability to dive deep into technical details to solve critical problems. As shown by Apple's SVP of Software, this hands-on capability builds respect and leads to better outcomes, challenging the 'empower and get out of the way' mantra.

The "treat others as you want to be treated" mantra fails in leadership because individuals have different motivations and work styles. Effective leaders adapt their approach, recognizing that their preferred hands-off style might not work for someone who needs more direct guidance.

New leaders must transition from being the expert to being a coach. This involves letting your team struggle and even fail. Ask open-ended questions like, "When have you faced something similar before?" to build their problem-solving skills instead of simply giving them the solution.

Many leaders, particularly in technical fields, mistakenly believe their role is to provide all the answers. This approach disempowers teams and creates a bottleneck. Shifting from advising to coaching unlocks a team's problem-solving potential and allows leaders to scale their impact.

A coaching-based leadership style is valuable for engagement but can fail in ambiguity. When a team struggles to find a "red thread" connecting their work, the leader must switch from asking questions to providing a clear, assertive frame and setting direction.