A powerful piece of advice from Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang encourages a cycle of impact. First, find a way to work on the most crucial projects ("get on the critical path"). Once your involvement becomes a bottleneck, your next job is to enable others and remove yourself ("get off it") to tackle the next challenge.

The primary purpose of hiring is not to add capacity for growth, but to free up the founder's time from low-value tasks. This allows the founder to reinvest their unique talents into activities that truly drive the business forward, making growth an outcome of strategic time reallocation.

There's often a massive gap between a company's strategic goals and where development teams actually spend time. In one case, only 2% of capacity was spent on the top strategic goal because teams are "magnets for requests" that derail progress on the big picture.

To achieve rapid growth without burnout, ruthlessly prioritize. Stop doing 90% of tasks and focus exclusively on the few initiatives that have the potential to 10x your business. Treat your focus like a laser that can burn through obstacles, not a wide light that diffuses energy.

Intentionally assigning fewer people to a project than seems necessary forces extreme focus on the highest priorities. Overstaffing is "poison" because it breeds politics, encourages work on non-essential tasks, and creates cruft that slows the entire company down.

Large companies like Rippling and TripActions maintain innovation velocity by creating "carved out" teams for new, "zero to one" initiatives. This organizational strategy provides singular focus, empowering a small group to execute with the intensity and speed of an early-stage startup without corporate distractions.

Treat your product and engineering teams as stewards of the company's most precious capital: their time. A capital allocation framework forces leadership to ask if this "investment" is being spent on the initiatives with the highest strategic return, not just fulfilling requests.

If hiring more people isn't increasing output, it's likely because you're adding 'ammunition' (individual contributors) without adding 'barrels' (the key people or projects that enable work). To scale effectively, you must increase the number of independent workstreams, not just the headcount within them.

Managers often spend disproportionate energy on low-performing employees. The highest-leverage activity is to actively invest in your top performers. Don't just leave them alone because they're doing well; run experiments by giving them bigger, more visible projects to unlock their full potential and create future leaders.