Successful individuals earn 'idiosyncrasy credit,' allowing them to deviate from social norms. However, observers often make the mistake of assuming these eccentricities were necessary for success. In reality, these behaviors are often tolerated or hidden until success provides the freedom to express them.

Related Insights

The stereotype of the brilliant but socially awkward tech founder is misleading. Horowitz argues that the most successful CEOs like Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page, and Elon Musk are actually "very smart about people." Those who truly lack the ability to understand others don't reach that level of success.

To get a group to accept unconventional ideas, first conform to its established values to build trust. This earns you "idiosyncrasy credits," which you can later "spend" on deviating from the norm without being rejected. This 'conform, then innovate' strategy was used by The Beatles to gain mainstream acceptance before experimenting.

Money acts as a "non-specific amplifier," much like alcohol or power. It doesn't fundamentally change your character but magnifies your existing traits—both good and bad. Insecurities become more pronounced, generosity becomes super-generosity, and a "micro asshole" becomes a "mega asshole."

The personality trait that drives outlier entrepreneurial success isn't mere ambition, but a "tortured" state of mind. These individuals feel a constant, painful inadequacy that compels them to achieve extraordinary things. This drive often comes at the expense of their personal well-being, family life, and mental health.

People surrounding a so-called genius, like Picasso's friends or employees at cult-like startups, often tolerate terrible behavior. They rationalize the unpleasantness by telling themselves they are part of an extraordinary, history-making experience, which creates a toxic enabling environment.

The narrative that vast tech fortunes are built on individual grit alone ignores the critical role of luck, timing, and systemic tailwinds. Recognizing fortune is key to humility and social responsibility, contrasting with the "obnoxious" belief of being purely self-made and entitled to the winnings.

Founders often start with strong intuition but lose it after achieving success. This occurs because long-held societal conditioning, which teaches individuals to distrust themselves and outsource authority to experts, resurfaces and mutes their inner voice.

Psychologist Michelle Gelfand's research shows societies exist on a spectrum from "tight" (strict norms, less crime) to "loose" (wider behaviors, more creativity). Feeling like an outsider may simply mean your workplace or social circle has a "tight" culture that values order over innovation.

The belief that perfectionism drives success is a myth. Research shows perfectionistic individuals often have lower income and productivity. The fear of not being perfect leads to paralysis and interferes with performance, contrasting with healthy "excellencism," which is adaptive and focuses on striving rather than flaw-avoidance.

Similar to how charisma is often ascribed to leaders only after their organizations succeed, we tend to label people as geniuses after a major achievement. This creates a narrative fallacy where we assume innate genius caused the success, rather than success causing the attribution of genius.