Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

An analysis of price changes shows that sectors with heavy government subsidies and regulation (healthcare, college, housing) experience rampant inflation. In contrast, highly competitive, less-regulated technology sectors (computers, cell phones) have seen significant price decreases, suggesting government intervention is a primary driver of inflation.

Related Insights

When the government guaranteed student loans, it removed the risk for colleges. This allowed them to hike tuition prices unchecked, knowing students had access to funding. The resulting flood of graduates has also made a college degree less of a differentiator in the job market.

An analysis of price changes reveals a stark trend: sectors with heavy government involvement and funding, such as college tuition and healthcare, have seen prices skyrocket. In contrast, free-market sectors like consumer electronics and software have become dramatically cheaper, suggesting government intervention stifles market competition and drives inflation.

The Fed's rate hikes fail to address the root causes of inflation in housing, education, and healthcare. These sectors suffer from structural issues like regulation and bureaucracy. Higher rates can even be counterproductive, for instance, by stifling new housing construction, which restricts supply.

While deregulation has made consumer goods like TVs drastically cheaper, essential family needs like healthcare, education, and housing have seen costs skyrocket. This suggests market dynamics that work for consumer electronics fail to provide affordable necessities for the average family.

A paradoxical market reality is that sectors with heavy government involvement, like healthcare and education, experience skyrocketing costs. In contrast, less-regulated, technology-driven sectors see prices consistently fall, suggesting a correlation between intervention and price inflation.

It's misleading to cite a single inflation number. There's massive deflation in globally competitive sectors like electronics (touched by China and the internet). Simultaneously, hyperinflation exists in state-regulated, protected domestic sectors like US education, healthcare, and housing.

Runaway costs in education, housing, and healthcare stem from government intervention. When the government promises to provide a service (e.g., student loans), it becomes a massive "buy-only" force with no price sensitivity, eliminating natural market forces and causing costs to balloon.

Government programs like unlimited student loans, acting as a single-payer in healthcare, and home ownership policies have artificially inflated demand and removed price constraints. This direct intervention, intended to help, is the root cause of runaway costs in housing, education, and healthcare, making them unaffordable.

The economy is split. Technology drives down prices in unregulated "blue sectors" (e.g., electronics), but heavily regulated "red sectors" (healthcare, education, housing) see prices skyrocket. These red sectors consume an ever-larger share of the economy, nullifying overall productivity gains from technology.

Our economy has fractured into two. One part, driven by technology (electronics, media), is hyper-deflationary. The other, dominated by regulation that constrains supply (housing, education, healthcare), is hyper-inflationary. This explains why 'fun' gets cheaper but life's necessities become unaffordable.