Before hunting for acquisitions, the internal business owner (deal sponsor) must write a thesis answering "what problem are we solving?" This prevents reactive M&A driven by inbound opportunities and ensures strategic alignment from the start, separating the "why" from the "who."

The foundation of a new M&A function is deep internal alignment. Before looking outward, the first month should be dedicated to interviewing internal product leaders and SMEs to understand the business, product roadmap, and strategic direction from the inside out.

Combining strategy, M&A, and integration under a single leader provides a full lifecycle, enterprise-wide view. This structure breaks down silos and creates a "closed-loop system" where post-deal integration performance and lessons learned directly feed back into future strategy and deal theses, refining success metrics beyond financials.

While high-velocity M&A requires dedicated staff, a low-volume approach relies more heavily on a single, seasoned integration leader. This leader must mentor and coach functional team members who are new to the M&A process, making their expertise vital for success.

An M&A lead's primary skill isn't deep expertise in every domain, but the ability to assemble and manage a team of specialists (tax, IT, ops). They must know enough to spot issues and deploy the right expert, coordinating findings to assess valuation and integration hurdles, much like a general contractor on a build site.

To avoid a broken handoff, embed key business and integration experts into the core deal team from the start. These members view diligence through an integration lens, validating synergy assumptions and timelines in real-time. This prevents post-signing surprises and ensures the deal model is operationally achievable, creating a seamless transition from deal-making to execution.

Palo Alto Networks' M&A playbook defies convention. Instead of integrating an acquisition under existing managers, they often replace their own internal team with the acquired leaders. The logic is that the acquired team won in the market with fewer resources, making them better equipped to lead that strategy forward.

A separate Integration Management Office (IMO) creates a risky handoff. A better model for agile teams is for the Corp Dev professional who sourced and led the deal to pivot and own the integration plan post-close. This ensures the original deal thesis is carried through execution without loss of context.

An M&A lead's role isn't to be an expert in tax or IT, but to assemble specialists. Like a general contractor, they must know enough to spot issues ('wires sticking out of the wall') and deploy the right expert, synthesizing findings to assess valuation and integration hurdles.