Traditional strategy forces "either/or" choices due to resource constraints. On social media, where distribution is cheap, the best strategy is "and." Don't choose between two brand names or content pillars; create content for both. This allows you to test what resonates with different audience segments without artificial limitation.
Once you've established credibility in one area, you can leverage that personal brand to expand into other topics. Don't worry that diversifying your content will dilute your original brand; your audience follows your communication abilities, not just your initial expertise.
Contrary to the 'niche down' mantra, discussing diverse personal interests (like sports or hobbies) creates more attachment points for your audience. This broad appeal can indirectly strengthen your core business by building a multi-faceted personal brand that people connect with on different levels.
Stop worrying that producing both high-level 'sizzle' content and deep, technical content will make you seem inconsistent. Your audience is not a monolith. This 'and' approach appeals to different segments and creates more connection points, rather than alienating anyone.
Instead of siloing brand and demand, view them as a unified function on a spectrum. The only difference is the scale of the audience, from mass market (brand) to a targeted market (demand). This reframes the relationship and encourages integrated thinking rather than creating separate camps.
Gen Z consumers curate different personas across various social channels (e.g., TikTok vs. LinkedIn), making brand positioning exponentially more complex. A brand's purpose must serve as a connective tissue, agile enough to be tweaked for different channel-specific identities while maintaining a core consistency.
This framework balances efforts: "Bonfires" are daily content; "Campfires" are smaller activations; and "Fireworks" are the one big, internet-breaking original moment per quarter. This structure helps teams balance reactive work with ambitious, proactive creative campaigns and allocate resources accordingly, as used by Zaria Parvez.
Strict adherence to brand cohesion often stifles creativity and results in subjective boardroom debates. Brands achieve more by focusing on creating relevant, timely content that resonates with their audience, even if it occasionally breaks established stylistic guidelines.
The traditional "one-to-many" broadcast model no longer delivers sufficient reach or engagement. Unilever now uses a "many-to-many" approach: the brand develops multiple message expressions, then activates creators to communicate them authentically to their respective audiences.
Instead of reactively trying to please algorithms, proactively identify the best 'doorways'—specific platforms and content formats—to reach your ideal audience. This shifts the focus from chasing reach to strategically choosing where you appear and how you present your brand.
The old strategy of a single brand account across multiple platforms is obsolete. A more effective modern approach is to supplement the main account with numerous persona-driven accounts (human or AI-generated). This distributed model creates a more authentic presence and multiplies the chances of content going viral.