Polls show a majority of Americans now believe AI will do more harm than good, an 11-point jump in one year. This negative sentiment is growing despite, and perhaps because of, rising adoption. The paradox is that increased AI fluency correlates with decreased optimism, particularly about the job market.

Americans see AI not as a tool for progress, but as the ultimate weapon for a new corporate ethos where profits surge *because* of layoffs and offshoring. This breaks the historical assumption that company success benefits employees, making workers view AI as an existential threat.

Most public criticism of AI is not driven by high-minded philosophy but by a fundamental fear of personal financial loss. People worry AI will threaten their livelihood and then rationalize this fear by couching it in noble-sounding arguments about the dangers to society.

Chinese citizens are optimistic about AI because they have a recent, tangible history of technology dramatically improving their standard of living. In contrast, many Americans feel economically stagnant or burdened by debt, leading them to view new technology like AI with suspicion and resentment rather than hope.

Despite leading the world in AI development, the American public is the least enthusiastic about the technology, according to a survey of 19 developed countries. This widespread skepticism and potential for a political backlash could act as a significant and unforeseen brake on AI adoption and implementation.

Despite being a leader in AI development, the US has significant negative public sentiment. This skepticism contrasts with more positive views in China and Europe and could hinder AI adoption, funding, and favorable regulation, creating a unique challenge for the industry's leaders.

The public is deeply skeptical of promises that AI will generate new employment opportunities. Polling shows a net trust rating of -40 for this claim. This sentiment is rooted in a broader feeling that the economy is 'rigged,' making voters unreceptive to optimistic technological narratives without concrete security guarantees.

The unpopularity of AI is not driven by sci-fi scenarios but by the immediate, personal question: 'What's going to happen to me?' Leaders have failed to explain how AI will concretely affect the jobs and opportunities of everyday workers.

Research shows the public is deeply anxious about AI's impact on jobs and wages. When polled, policies that fund job creation and benefits decisively beat those prioritizing innovation to 'outcompete China,' even among conservative voters. This economic anxiety, not abstract risk, is the primary driver of public opinion on AI regulation.