Despite significant upfront costs of $15-20 billion to bring 500,000 barrels per day online, developing Venezuela's oil sector is comparatively inexpensive. The cost is estimated to be 25% cheaper than current deepwater projects in neighboring countries, presenting a compelling relative value proposition for energy investors if political risks can be mitigated.
Related Insights
The prospect of reviving Venezuela's vast but dormant oil industry introduces significant potential for increased global supply. Morgan Stanley suggests this could suppress prices in the medium-term, a counter-intuitive outcome where resolving geopolitical tension leads to lower commodity prices rather than higher ones.
Before any significant capital flows into Venezuela's oil sector, the near future will be dedicated to political negotiation and establishing a stable legal framework. Major players like Exxon still consider the country "uninvestable," meaning the primary focus will be on creating the conditions for future investment, not the investment itself.
Chevron's decision to remain in Venezuela, unlike other oil majors, isn't just about future potential. It's heavily influenced by massive, decades-long sunk costs, including U.S. Gulf Coast refineries specifically optimized to process Venezuela's unique heavy sour crude.
J.P. Morgan's research projects Venezuela could reach 1.4 million barrels per day in two years, but feedback from industry players suggests these numbers are "too low." This indicates that the U.S. administration and energy executives anticipate a much faster and larger production ramp-up than currently modeled.
Contrary to assumptions, oil majors are cautious about re-entering Venezuela. They worry about a lack of legal certainty and the risk that any deals could be undone and heavily scrutinized by a future U.S. administration, making the investment too risky.
A potential restart of Venezuelan oil is significant because it is a heavy, diesel-rich crude that has become scarce as U.S. shale dominates supply with light oil. U.S. Gulf Coast refiners, built decades ago, are specifically configured to process this heavy crude, creating a unique high-margin opportunity.
Venezuela produces heavy sour crude, which only specialized refineries can process. U.S. Gulf Coast refiners like Valero are poised to benefit from a cheaper, more abundant feedstock. This new supply could displace more expensive Canadian and Mexican crude, improving refinery margins.
To spur investment in Venezuela's risky environment, the U.S. administration may need to employ a "carrot and stick" approach with oil majors. This could involve offering capital guarantees to de-risk investments (the carrot) or threatening to revoke leases on U.S. federal lands for non-compliance (the stick).
Market fears of Venezuelan oil flooding the market are misplaced. Experts estimate it will take at least three years and significant investment to bring just one million barrels per day of production back online. The immediate supply Venezuela can offer is minimal, making the news irrelevant to the 2026 price outlook.
The hosts argue that even with vast oil reserves and government encouragement, the political instability, power vacuum, and lack of rule of law in Venezuela make it a poor investment for oil companies. The cost and uncertainty of securing profits are too high.
