Kalshi uses market makers to solve the cold-start problem and bootstrap liquidity for new contracts. However, as a market becomes more successful and organic volume grows, the percentage of market maker participation intentionally decreases. Their role is to ignite the flywheel, not to be the engine itself.
Related Insights
Creating liquidity in private markets is not about better tech like blockchain. The core challenge is one of market structure: finding a buyer when everyone wants to sell. Without a mechanism to provide a capital backstop during liquidity shocks, technology alone cannot create a functional secondary market.
Kalshi argues its market-based system for sports events is superior to traditional sportsbooks because anyone can be a price maker, not just a price taker. This results in better odds and a user win/loss ratio closer to 50/50, framing it as an equitable financial market rather than a house-always-wins model.
Intense competition forces companies to innovate their products and marketing more aggressively. This rivalry validates the market's potential, accelerates its growth, and ultimately benefits the entire ecosystem and its customers, rather than being a purely zero-sum game.
Unlike competitors using crypto to operate outside regulatory frameworks, Kalshi's CEO views on-chain technology as a tool to enhance a regulated system. He envisions using it for clearing to improve immutability and transparency, enabling a permissionless ecosystem built upon a compliant foundation.
Vested works directly with employees because startups find small, one-off secondary transactions burdensome due to legal fees and cap table complexity. However, this dynamic inverts at scale. Once Vested facilitates millions in transactions for a single company's stock, the startup has a strong incentive to partner on a formal liquidity program.
The success of protocols like Hyperliquid proves product-market fit for on-chain derivatives. This attracts new competitors who use zero-fee models and airdrops to steal market share, forcing a race to the bottom on fees until only one dominant player remains and can re-introduce them.
Though a small portion of the market's NAV, retail investor participation is growing at 50% annually. This new, consistent capital flow is a significant structural change, increasing overall market liquidity and enabling more transactions.
The main barrier to institutional adoption of prediction markets for hedging is not a lack of interest, but insufficient liquidity. Large hedge funds and corporations need to be able to place trades in the tens of millions of dollars for it to be worthwhile, a scale Kalshi's markets have yet to consistently reach.
Before focusing on product or growth, Kalshi's entire initial effort was on legalizing prediction markets. For founders in regulated industries, this shows that navigating the legal landscape isn't a parallel task—it is the primary business until a framework for operation is secured.