Despite revenue growth, Salesforce is not expanding its engineering team. Marc Benioff states that tools like Claude Code and Cursor have made his existing 15,000 engineers so much more productive that he can keep headcount flat. In contrast, he is hiring 20% more account executives to manage customer relationships.
Related Insights
AI allows companies to suppress their 'hunger' for new hires, even as revenues grow. This breaks the historical correlation where top-line growth required headcount growth, enabling companies to increase profits by shrinking their workforce—a profound shift in corporate strategy.
Marc Benioff explicitly stated a headcount reduction from 9,000 to 5,000 in customer support due to AI agents. He then detailed applying the same agentic AI to sales and marketing, implying a similar workforce reduction is planned for those departments.
Don't view AI through a cost-cutting lens. If AI makes a single software developer 10x more productive—generating $5M in value instead of $500k—the rational business decision is to hire more developers to scale that value creation, not fewer.
Coastline Academy frames AI's value around productivity gains, not just expense reduction. Their small engineering team increased output by 80% in one year without new hires by using AI as an augmentation tool. This approach focuses on scaling capabilities rather than simply shrinking teams.
While high-profile layoffs make headlines, the more widespread effect of AI is that companies are maintaining or reducing headcount through attrition rather than active firing. They are leveraging AI to grow their business without expanding their workforce, creating a challenging hiring environment for new entrants.
The paradigm has shifted from linear scaling (more people equals more revenue) to efficiency-driven growth. Leaders who still use "I don't have enough headcount" as an excuse for missing targets are operating with an obsolete model and hindering progress in the AI era.
When offered a choice between an extra hire or expensive AI coding subscriptions for their team, line managers almost always choose the headcount for team growth. VPs, focused on broader business metrics, often prefer the AI tool for its potential productivity gains across multiple teams.
The idea that AI will enable billion-dollar companies with tiny teams is a myth. Increased productivity from AI raises the competitive bar and opens up more opportunities, compelling ambitious companies to hire more people to build more product and win.
While known for external AI applications, Uber's CEO reveals the most significant value from AI comes from internal tools that enhance developer productivity. AI agents for on-call engineering make engineers "superhumans" and more valuable, leading Uber to hire more, not fewer, engineers.
Mike Cannon-Brookes argues that AI makes developers more efficient, but since the demand for new technology is effectively unlimited, companies will simply build more. This will lead to a net increase in hiring for engineering talent, not a reduction.
