When offered a choice between an extra hire or expensive AI coding subscriptions for their team, line managers almost always choose the headcount for team growth. VPs, focused on broader business metrics, often prefer the AI tool for its potential productivity gains across multiple teams.
Related Insights
The best barometer for AI's enterprise value is not replacing the bottom 5% of workers. A better goal is empowering most employees to become 10x more productive. This reframes the AI conversation from a cost-cutting tool to a massive value-creation engine through human-AI partnership.
A pragmatic way to fund expensive AI tools is to reallocate the budget from headcount that leaves through natural attrition. When a GTM role departs, use their budgeted salary to fund AI agents that can scale the work of the remaining team, avoiding new budget requests and the need to fire performers.
Advanced management techniques, like using AI to suggest team improvements, no longer require specialized software or data science teams. A manager can use an off-the-shelf tool like ChatGPT, feed it a simple spreadsheet of performance data, and ask it to run the analysis, democratizing access to managerial 'superpowers'.
The true ROI of AI lies in reallocating the time and resources saved from automation towards accelerating growth and innovation. Instead of simply cutting staff, companies should use the efficiency gains to pursue new initiatives that increase demand for their products or services.
When transitioning Box to be "AI first," CEO Aaron Levie explicitly communicated that the goal was not to reduce headcount or cut costs. Instead, he framed AI as a tool to increase company output, speed, and customer service, which successfully aligned employees with the new strategy by removing fear.
AI agent platforms are typically priced by usage, not seats, making initial costs low. Instead of a top-down mandate for one tool, leaders should encourage teams to expense and experiment with several options. The best solution for the team will emerge organically through use.
C-suites are more motivated to adopt AI for revenue-generating "front office" activities (like investment analysis) than for cost-saving "back office" automation. The direct, tangible impact on making more money overcomes the organizational inertia that often stalls efficiency-focused technology deployments.
Coastline Academy frames AI's value around productivity gains, not just expense reduction. Their small engineering team increased output by 80% in one year without new hires by using AI as an augmentation tool. This approach focuses on scaling capabilities rather than simply shrinking teams.
Historically, labor costs dwarfed software spending. As AI automates tasks, software budgets will balloon, turning into a primary corporate expense. This forces CFOs to scrutinize software ROI with the same rigor they once applied only to their workforce.
Powerful AI assistants are shifting hiring calculus. Rather than building large, specialized departments, some leaders are considering hiring small teams of experienced, curious generalists. These individuals can leverage AI to solve problems across functions like sales, HR, and operations, creating a leaner, more agile organization.
