Inspired by fully automated manufacturing, this approach mandates that no human ever writes or reviews code. AI agents handle the entire development lifecycle from spec to deployment, driven by the declining cost of tokens and increasingly capable models.
Related Insights
Unlike co-pilots that assist developers, Factory's “droids” are designed to be autonomous. This reframes the developer's job from writing code to mastering delegation—clearly defining tasks and success criteria for an AI agent to execute independently.
As AI coding agents generate vast amounts of code, the most tedious part of a developer's job shifts from writing code to reviewing it. This creates a new product opportunity: building tools that help developers validate and build confidence in AI-written code, making the review process less of a chore.
The cost to run an autonomous AI coding agent is surprisingly low, reframing the value of developer time. A single coding iteration can cost as little as $3, meaning a complete feature built over 10 iterations could be completed for around $30, making complex software development radically more accessible.
The most significant productivity gains come from applying AI to every stage of development, including research, planning, product marketing, and status updates. Limiting AI to just code generation misses the larger opportunity to automate the entire engineering process.
Snyk founder's new venture, TESOL, posits that AI will make code disposable. Instead of code being the source of truth, a durable, versioned 'spec' document defining requirements will become the core asset. AI agents will generate the implementation, fundamentally changing software development.
Cisco is developing its AI defense product entirely with AI-written code, with human engineers acting as "spec developers." This fundamentally changes the software development lifecycle, making code review—not code creation—the primary bottleneck and indicating a future where engineering productivity is redefined.
Factory frames the AI coding landscape using the Henry Ford analogy. AI assistants that simply speed up line-by-line coding are merely 'faster horses.' The true paradigm shift—the 'automobile'—is delegating entire tasks to autonomous agents, fundamentally changing the developer workflow.
AI acts as a massive force multiplier for software development. By using AI agents for coding and code review, with humans providing high-level direction and final approval, a two-person team can achieve the output of a much larger engineering organization.
Experienced engineers using tools like Claude Code are no longer writing significant amounts of code. Their primary role shifts to designing systems, defining tasks, and managing a team of AI agents that perform the actual implementation, fundamentally changing the software development workflow.
The current model of a developer using an AI assistant is like a craftsman with a power tool. The next evolution is "factory farming" code, where orchestrated multi-agent systems manage the entire development lifecycle—planning, implementation, review, and testing—moving it from a craft to an industrial process.
