As AI personalization grows, user consent will evolve beyond cookies. A key future control will be the "do not train" option, letting users opt out of their data being used to train AI models, presenting a new technical and ethical challenge for brands.

Related Insights

To succeed, marketers must stop passively accepting the data they're given. Instead, they must proactively partner with IT and privacy teams to advocate for the specific data collection and governance required to power their growth and personalization initiatives.

As consumers delegate purchasing to personal AI agents, marketing's emotional appeals will fail. Brands must prepare for a "Business-to-Machine" (B2M) world where algorithms evaluate products on function and data, rendering decades of psychological tactics obsolete.

Companies often focus on avoiding fines by being overly cautious with data, a practice called "under-permissioning." This creates a huge opportunity cost by shrinking the marketable audience and leading to wasted ad spend on generalized campaigns.

Beyond data privacy, a key ethical responsibility for marketers using AI is ensuring content integrity. This means using platforms that provide a verifiable trail for every asset, check for originality, and offer AI-assisted verification for factual accuracy. This protects the brand, ensures content is original, and builds customer trust.

To test complex AI prompts for tasks like customer persona generation without exposing sensitive company data, first ask the AI to create realistic, synthetic data (e.g., fake sales call notes). This allows you to safely develop and refine prompts before applying them to real, proprietary information, overcoming data privacy hurdles in experimentation.

Organizations must urgently develop policies for AI agents, which take action on a user's behalf. This is not a future problem. Agents are already being integrated into common business tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Salesforce, creating new risks that existing generative AI policies do not cover.

While the industry chases complex AI, research shows less than half of marketers (42%) use basic preference data for personalization. This highlights a massive, untapped opportunity to improve customer experience with existing data before investing in advanced technology.

The market reality is that consumers and businesses prioritize the best-performing AI models, regardless of whether their training data was ethically sourced. This dynamic incentivizes labs to use all available data, including copyrighted works, and treat potential fines as a cost of doing business.

Avoid the 'settings screen' trap where endless customization options cater to a vocal minority but create complexity for everyone. Instead, focus on personalization: using behavioral data to intelligently surface the right features to the right users, improving their experience without adding cognitive load for the majority.

When developing AI for sensitive industries like government, anticipate that some customers will be skeptical. Design AI features with clear, non-AI alternatives. This allows you to sell to both "AI excited" and "AI skeptical" jurisdictions, ensuring wider market penetration.