The adoption of generative AI, such as Canva's GPT integration, is first impacting freelance labor in countries like the Philippines. This trend shows accessible AI tools initially replace easily outsourced, lower-cost international workers, not domestic professionals.

Related Insights

Unlike past industrial shifts, AI's impact won't be contained to specific industries. Once AI can perfectly replicate a human worker behind a keyboard, video, and mouse, it will trigger a simultaneous displacement wave across all remote-capable jobs.

October saw the highest number of U.S. job cuts in two decades, with consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas explicitly citing AI adoption as a key driver. This data confirms that AI's impact on employment is an ongoing event, moving beyond speculation into measurable, significant job displacement.

A benchmark testing AI agents against paid freelance jobs found the best performers could only autonomously complete 2.5% of the work. This provides a crucial reality check, showing that while AI excels at discrete tasks, full job automation by general-purpose agents is still far from reality.

AI systems from companies like Meta and OpenAI rely on a vast, unseen workforce of data labelers in developing nations. These communities perform the crucial but low-paid labor that powers modern AI, yet they are often the most marginalized and least likely to benefit from the technology they help build.

Just as NAFTA brought cheap goods but eliminated manufacturing jobs, AI will create immense productivity via a new class of "digital immigrants" (AIs in data centers). This will generate abundance and cheap digital services but risks displacing vast swaths of cognitive labor and concentrating wealth.

A powerful mental model for the future of work is a three-step pipeline. If a job can be done remotely in a high-cost country, it can be offshored to a low-cost one. Once offshored and process-driven, it becomes a prime target for AI automation. This positions remote work as a transitional phase, not an endpoint.

The narrative of AI destroying jobs misses a key point: AI allows companies to 'hire software for a dollar' for tasks that were never economical to assign to humans. This will unlock new services and expand the economy, creating demand in areas that previously didn't exist.

Frame AI not as a tool, but as a wave of "digital immigrants" with superhuman cognitive abilities. Similar to how the NAFTA trade agreement outsourced manufacturing, AI will outsource knowledge work. This will create abundance for some but risks hollowing out the middle class and social fabric.

Google's Nano Banana Pro is so powerful in generating high-quality visuals, infographics, and cinematic images that companies can achieve better design output with fewer designers. This pressures creative professionals to become expert AI tool operators rather than just creators.

The stark quality difference between infographics generated by Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT demonstrates a tangible leap in AI's creative capabilities. This ability to produce publication-ready design in seconds presents a clear, immediate threat to roles like graphic designers and illustrators, moving job displacement from theory to reality.