Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Towards the end of a negotiation, when major discounts are exhausted, shift to asking for trivial concessions like minor changes in billing terms. This 'grandma counting out change' tactic subtly communicates that you have no more significant value to give.

Related Insights

When you easily concede on seemingly small items like payment terms, you inadvertently tell the customer that your pricing isn't firm. This encourages them to push for more discounts, slowing down the deal. Instead, trade every concession for something of value to your business.

Frame every negotiation around four core business drivers. Offer discounts not as concessions, but as payments for the customer giving you something valuable: more volume, faster cash payments, a longer contract commitment, or a predictable closing date. This shifts the conversation from haggling to a structured, collaborative process.

Conventional deal-making focuses on winning every point. Superior negotiators, however, identify the one thing that matters most and willingly concede on everything else to get it. This is especially true when you understand the value of that single outcome better than the other party.

A truly successful negotiation requires both a great outcome and a positive experience for the other side. A key tactic is to strategically concede something you don't have to. This builds goodwill and ensures the relationship survives, which is crucial for long-term partnerships.

Zayo CEO Dan Caruso would sometimes counter a seller's offer with a lower number than his previous bid. This unorthodox move was designed to create emotional distress, reframe control, and break a negotiation stalemate.

If you can't meet a buyer's exact ask, present two final options that force a tradeoff between their most important variables. For example, offer a higher price for a one-year deal vs. a lower price for a two-year deal. This empowers them to choose while ensuring you win either way.

When a buyer asks for an unreasonable discount, frame it as a fundamental value misalignment and suggest you're not a fit. This forces them to moderate their position and prove they're serious, pulling them back into a reasonable negotiation.

When a buyer requests to reduce deal scope late in a negotiation (e.g., halving the user count), don't just cut the price in half. Explain that your pricing is based on volume. Frame the change as a fundamental shift in the deal's economics, which will increase the per-unit cost, making the smaller deal less attractive and protecting your original proposal.

Shift adversarial negotiations to collaborative problem-solving by transparently explaining your pricing model is based on four levers: volume, timing of cash, length of commitment, and timing of the deal. When a customer asks for a concession, you can explore which of the other levers they can adjust, making it a mutual exchange of value rather than a zero-sum haggle.

When an enterprise client asks for a concession, always ask for something in return. This 'get' doesn't have to be monetary—it can be a commitment to a timeline or an introduction to a stakeholder. This forces the client to value your 'give' and maintains deal momentum.