Monetary policy and bank regulation are two sides of the same coin. Since private banks create money through lending, any regulatory action (like changing capital requirements) directly influences the money supply. Giving the executive branch control over regulation would undermine an independent monetary policy.

Beyond its stated goals of employment and price stability, the Fed's recent aggressive asset purchases show its primary role is often to ensure smooth market functioning, making it dependent on market signals.

Current repo market stress is a structural problem caused by tight bank regulations, not a simple liquidity issue. To effectively shrink its balance sheet (QT), the Fed must first ease capital requirements. This counterintuitively acts as a nominal growth impulse by freeing banks to lend.

While interest rates are set by a committee vote, the Federal Reserve Chair wields immense influence by deciding what policy to propose and acting as the primary communicator to markets. The public and financial markets give deference to the chair's views, making their ability to shape the narrative a powerful tool.

The post-Powell Fed is likely to reverse the QE playbook. The strategy will involve aggressive rate cuts to lower the cost of capital, combined with deregulation (like SLR exemptions) to incentivize commercial banks to take over money creation. This marks a fundamental shift from central bank-led liquidity to private sector-led credit expansion.

A major regime change is underway to "reprivatize the financial system." This involves shrinking the Fed's footprint and loosening bank regulations to compel commercial banks to step back into their pre-GFC role as the primary creators of credit and market liquidity, reducing reliance on the central bank.

While presidents focus on interest rates, a Fed Chair like Kevin Warsh has limited sway as one of 12 votes. His real impact will be on technical areas like the Fed's balance sheet, where he has stronger personal convictions and faces less political scrutiny.

The Federal Reserve's monetary policy is less effective today. The growth of private credit and large firms self-financing investments (like in AI) means significant economic activity is insulated from traditional bank lending channels, reducing the impact of rate hikes.

The Federal Reserve's power extends beyond setting interest rates to controlling the nation's core financial infrastructure. This supervisory power could be weaponized by a politicized board in ways that don't directly affect the value of the dollar, meaning bond markets wouldn't signal the danger.