The market is seeing a rise in vertically integrated models where one company owns the exchange, broker, and clearinghouse. This, along with direct-to-consumer models, creates inconsistencies with traditional, separated structures. The CFTC recognizes the need to create holistic rules to prevent regulatory arbitrage between these new models.
Related Insights
The current capital market structure, with its high fees, delays, and limited access, is a direct result of regulations from the 1930s. These laws created layers of intermediaries to enforce trust, baking in complexity and rent-seeking by design. This historical context explains why the system is ripe for disruption by more efficient technologies.
The explosive growth of prediction markets is driven by regulatory arbitrage. They capture immense value from the highly-regulated sports betting industry by operating under different, less restrictive rules for 'prediction markets,' despite significant product overlap.
The CFTC and SEC leadership advocate for remaining separate agencies due to their distinct missions: risk management versus capital formation. They argue the key to resolving jurisdictional issues is better coordination, not consolidation, and plan to implement a new memorandum of understanding to harmonize rules and share data.
The next evolution in fintech will be regulated applications that offer seamless trading across traditional securities, tokenized assets, and native crypto. This framework allows direct user access to DeFi protocols like staking and lending from a single, compliant, and user-friendly platform, bridging the gap between two currently separate financial worlds.
Kalshi’s key strategic move was getting its prediction markets regulated by the federal CFTC, similar to commodities. This established federal preemption, meaning state-level laws don't apply. This allowed them to operate nationwide with a single regulator instead of seeking approval in 50 different states.
The CFTC can regulate prediction markets on diverse events because the legal definition of "commodity" is incredibly broad. The Commodity Exchange Act covers virtually everything in commerce except for a few specific carve-outs like onions and box office receipts, granting the agency expansive jurisdiction over non-traditional markets.
CME Group's CEO uses the analogy of Sears being disrupted by Amazon to explain the strategic imperative for embracing retail trading. The fear of becoming obsolete by failing to adapt to new market participants and technologies is a primary motivator for legacy exchanges to partner with modern platforms like FanDuel.
Some prediction markets operate under older "no-action letters" that let them bypass traditional brokers (FCMs). This creates a regulatory gap, as stringent marketing and advertising rules that apply to FCMs do not cover these direct-to-exchange platforms, leading to inconsistent standards for consumer-facing communication.
The next evolution in fintech is a single, unified platform where users can leverage one pool of capital to trade seamlessly across equities, crypto, and prediction markets. This eliminates the friction of managing separate accounts and KYC processes for different asset classes.
The "market structure" debate in crypto regulation is about updating pre-internet laws. These laws require intermediaries like broker-dealers for trust, but blockchain makes them obsolete through cryptographic verification, creating legislative tension.
