Blockchain's disruption will not impact all of finance equally. Trading firms are safe because market making is a fundamental need. However, intermediaries like banks, exchanges, and custodians face an existential threat as their core function—managing ledgers and access—is directly replaced by blockchain's "private key and a ledger" infrastructure.

America's system of nearly 10,000 banks is not a market inefficiency but a direct result of the founding fathers' aversion to centralized, oligopolistic British banks. They deliberately architected a fractured system to prevent the concentration of financial power and to better serve local business people, a principle that still shapes the economy today.

The classic model is an entrepreneur raising equity, then seeking debt. Today, the market is flooded with capital mandated to provide debt, while equity providers are scarce. This inversion distorts economic development by prioritizing lending over genuine entrepreneurial risk-taking.

High-frequency trading (HFT) firms use proprietary exchange data feeds to legally front-run retail and institutional orders. This systemic disadvantage erodes investor confidence, pushing them toward high-risk YOLO call options and sports betting to seek returns.

Serving thousands of individual investors requires a huge investment in "nuts and bolts" infrastructure for administration, processing, and reporting. This operational complexity and cost, not client-facing apps, is the primary hurdle for GPs entering the retail space, moving from analog processes to complex digital systems.

Regulatory capture is not an abstract problem. It has tangible negative consequences for everyday consumers, such as the elimination of free checking accounts after the Dodd-Frank Act was passed, or rules preventing physicians from opening new hospitals, which stifles competition and drives up costs.

The US banking system is technologically behind countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America. This inefficiency stems from a protected regulatory environment that fosters a status quo. In contrast, markets like the UK have implemented fintech-friendly charters, enabling innovators like Revolut to thrive.

The system often blamed as capitalism is distorted. True capitalism requires the risk of failure as a clearing mechanism. Today's system is closer to cronyism, where government interventions like bailouts and regulatory capture protect established players from failure.

The trend of companies staying private longer and raising huge late-stage rounds isn't just about VC exuberance. It's a direct consequence of a series of regulations (like Sarbanes-Oxley) that made going public extremely costly and onerous. As a result, the private capital markets evolved to fill the gap, fundamentally changing venture capital.