The "market structure" debate in crypto regulation is about updating pre-internet laws. These laws require intermediaries like broker-dealers for trust, but blockchain makes them obsolete through cryptographic verification, creating legislative tension.

Related Insights

The current capital market structure, with its high fees, delays, and limited access, is a direct result of regulations from the 1930s. These laws created layers of intermediaries to enforce trust, baking in complexity and rent-seeking by design. This historical context explains why the system is ripe for disruption by more efficient technologies.

Crypto's primary advantage is its ability to automate processes that rely on expensive human-based trust (brokers, lawyers) with software and cryptography, which offer mathematical guarantees at a fraction of the cost.

Contrary to belief, the crypto industry's primary need is not deregulation but clear, predictable rules. The ambiguous "regulation through enforcement" approach, where rules are defined via prosecution, creates uncertainty that drives innovation and capital offshore.

Institutions define "institutional-grade" as having human safety nets, negotiating leverage, and someone to call. This directly contradicts the core crypto ethos of removing human intermediaries and soft power, creating an ironic tension for crypto protocols seeking institutional adoption.

Unlike competitors using crypto to operate outside regulatory frameworks, Kalshi's CEO views on-chain technology as a tool to enhance a regulated system. He envisions using it for clearing to improve immutability and transparency, enabling a permissionless ecosystem built upon a compliant foundation.

Blockchain's disruption will not impact all of finance equally. Trading firms are safe because market making is a fundamental need. However, intermediaries like banks, exchanges, and custodians face an existential threat as their core function—managing ledgers and access—is directly replaced by blockchain's "private key and a ledger" infrastructure.

While the early crypto market was dominated by cypherpunks advocating for anonymity, Coinbase took the opposite approach. They worked with banks and implemented KYC, betting that mainstream adoption required a compliant, trusted platform, even though it alienated the initial user base.

The friction in the current financial system—intermediary fees, settlement delays, and complex processes—acts like a tax paid by everyone. Crypto aims to eliminate this "tax" by creating more efficient, direct transaction pathways, akin to paving over potholed roads.

The next evolution in fintech will be regulated applications that offer seamless trading across traditional securities, tokenized assets, and native crypto. This framework allows direct user access to DeFi protocols like staking and lending from a single, compliant, and user-friendly platform, bridging the gap between two currently separate financial worlds.

The paradigm shift with crypto is not about trusting a new entity like a developer. Instead, it eliminates the need for interpersonal trust by allowing anyone—especially competing businesses—to verify the system's integrity through open-source code.