Statisticians now believe local Chinese governments have lied about demographics for over 25 years. The realization came from plummeting tax receipts, suggesting millions of children thought born in the late 90s never existed. The country's population may be overstated by 100-300 million people, accelerating its collapse.
Related Insights
The difficulty in hiring young talent is not a temporary trend but a "new ice age." It is driven by a smaller Gen Z population compared to millennials. The problem will worsen: within a decade, more people over 65 will be leaving careers than 16-year-olds are starting them, creating a long-term demographic crisis for employers.
When a society's most aspirational role models (e.g., K-pop stars) are contractually celibate and childless, it creates a powerful cultural script against coupling and family formation. This mimetic effect can significantly impact national birth rates by devaluing parenthood as a life goal for an entire generation.
The rise of a precarious gig workforce of over 200 million people directly contradicts the Communist Party's founding promise of a "dictatorship of the proletariat." This growing underclass, living with minimal security and rights, represents a societal shift towards a capitalist-style structure that the party was originally formed to overthrow, creating a deep ideological crisis.
Chinese policymakers champion AI as a key driver of economic productivity but appear to be underestimating its potential for social upheaval. There is little indication they are planning for the mass displacement of the gig economy workforce, who will be the first casualties of automation. This focus on technological gains over social safety nets creates a significant future political risk.
The city wasn't simply bad at accounting; it effectively had no centralized system. Finances were tracked on scraps of paper and in drawers, making it impossible to know the true state of its debt. This systemic failure, not just policy choices, made the collapse inevitable.
Despite rhetoric about shifting to a consumption-led economy, China's rigid annual GDP growth targets make this impossible. This political necessity forces a constant return to state-driven fixed asset investment to hit the numbers. The result is a "cha-cha" of economic policy—one step toward rebalancing, two steps back toward the old model—making any true shift short-lived.
China deliberately maintains an undervalued renminbi to make its exports cheaper globally. This strategy props up its manufacturing-led growth model, even though it hinders economic rebalancing and reduces the purchasing power of its own citizens.
The dramatic drop in China's Fixed Asset Investment isn't a sign of economic failure. Instead, it reflects a deliberate government-led "anti-involution" campaign to strip out industrial overcapacity. This painful but planned adjustment aims to create a more streamlined, profitable economy, fundamentally reordering its growth model away from sheer volume.
A historical indicator of a superpower's decline is when its spending on debt servicing surpasses its military budget. The US crossed this threshold a few years ago, while China is massively increasing military spending. This economic framework offers a stark, quantitative lens through which to view the long-term power shift between the two nations.
Even if China could fully automate production to offset its shrinking workforce, its economic model would still collapse. AI and robots cannot replace the essential roles of human consumers, taxpayers, and parents, which are necessary for economic vitality, government revenue, and generational replacement.