Ger Brophy argues the popular "servant leadership" model is flawed. He has witnessed it enable leaders to avoid making difficult choices and then blame their teams for the resulting failures. He advocates for a more direct approach: leaders must lead, take accountability, and own the consequences of their decisions.
Related Insights
Relying on consensus to make decisions is an abdication of leadership. The process optimizes for avoiding downsides rather than achieving excellence, leading to mediocre "6 out of 10" outcomes and preventing the outlier successes that leadership can unlock.
When diagnosing a failing department, stop looking for tactical issues. The problem is always the leader, full stop. A great leader can turn a mediocre team into a great one, but a mediocre leader will inevitably turn a great team mediocre. Don't waste time; solve the leadership problem first.
Shift your mindset from feeling responsible for your employees' actions and feelings to being responsible *to* them. Fulfill your obligations of providing training, resources, and clear expectations, but empower them to own their own performance and problems.
Traditional accountability is often a fear-based tactic that backfires by killing creativity. The leader's role is not to be an enforcer, but a facilitator who builds a system where people willingly hold themselves accountable to meaningful, shared goals.
The desire to be a popular boss is a trap. Prioritizing being liked often means avoiding boundaries and tough feedback, which creates an unsafe, unproductive environment. Leadership requires earning respect by providing clear direction, setting standards, and trusting your team—which is what they actually value.
If a decision has universal agreement, a leader isn't adding value because the group would have reached that conclusion anyway. True leadership is demonstrated when you make a difficult, unpopular choice that others would not, guiding the organization through necessary but painful steps.
Peets warns against leaders who are universally beloved by their teams. He believes effective leadership requires conflict to drive performance. A leader focused on being popular will avoid tough conversations and decisions, ultimately failing the team. Respect, not likability, is the crucial trait.
Empathy, defined as merely feeling another's pain, is overrated and can lead to inaction. Effective leadership requires compassion: understanding a problem, feeling a connection, identifying a solution, and having the courage to implement it, even when it's difficult or unpopular.
An effective leadership philosophy can be simplified to the CATS framework. C: Bring clarity on the 'why'. A: Empower teams with accountability. T: Build trust through transparency. S: Practice servant leadership to make others successful.
Leaders who complain their team isn't as good as them are misplacing blame. They are the ones who hired and trained those individuals. The team's failure is ultimately the leader's failure in either talent selection, skill development, or both, demanding radical ownership.
