Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Instead of risking $100M+ on one blockbuster, studios can fund numerous low-budget films from proven creators. The massive ROI from one hit like 'Obsession' can cover the costs of many failures, mirroring a VC's "fund returner" model.

Related Insights

Instead of betting hundreds of millions on a single blockbuster, studios can use AI to drastically lower production costs. This enables a 'go wider' strategy, funding numerous smaller projects based on 'B-tier' IP like Warhammer, de-risking their content portfolio.

Just as AWS enabled startups to build products before seeking VC funding, YouTube allows creators to build an audience and prove their filmmaking skills. Hollywood can now invest in creators with demonstrated traction and finished work, not just ideas on paper.

Legendary Hollywood producer Bob Shea's strategy was to invest in people, not projects. He'd "buy the writer," not just the script, knowing that even if one project failed, a talented creator is a long-term asset capable of producing future hits. This principle applies to all forms of investment.

Studios are increasingly acquiring rights to books that go viral on TikTok's 'BookTok' community, sometimes even before publication. This provides a pre-vetted story with a built-in, passionate audience, significantly reducing the financial risk of large production budgets. TikTok has effectively become Hollywood's outsourced market validation platform.

Traditional media companies are turning to successful YouTube creators to source proven concepts and talent. They offer upfront capital to scale existing YouTube IP into larger productions, creating a symbiotic relationship between once-separate platforms.

Analyst Ben Thompson's 2017 prediction is coming true. The internet, particularly YouTube, creates a merit-based filter where creators must prove their value to an audience first, bypassing traditional Hollywood gatekeepers. This makes them a more proven bet for film success.

Unlike studios risking billions on upfront investments, YouTube only pays for successful content via revenue sharing. Creators then reinvest this money into better productions, improving the platform's overall quality and capturing more audience attention in a virtuous, self-funding cycle.

Successful YouTubers prove their artistic vision and production skills on their channels, acting like a startup with a proven product seeking Series A funding. This de-risks new IP for Hollywood studios, proving more valuable than a large but passive subscriber base.

Like AWS enabled startups to build products before seeking venture capital, free tools like Blender allow filmmakers to create content and prove audience demand on YouTube. Hollywood studios then act like Series A investors, backing proven "products" with traction rather than just ideas.

Recent YouTube-to-Hollywood successes like *Obsession* and *Backrooms* aren't just about converting subscribers. These creators proved their artistic vision and technical skills through years of producing content, making them a lower-risk bet for studios on new IP.