During due diligence, it's crucial to look beyond returns. Top allocators analyze a manager's decision-making process, not just the outcome. They penalize managers who were “right for the wrong reasons” (luck) and give credit to those who were “wrong for the right reasons” (good process, bad luck).

To ensure genuine collaboration across funds, Centerbridge structures compensation so a "substantial minority" of an individual's pay comes from other areas of the firm. This economic incentive forces a firm-wide perspective and makes being "part of one team" a financial reality, not just a cultural slogan.

Venture capital returns materialize over a decade, making short-term outputs like markups unreliable 'mirages.' Sequoia instead measures partners on tangible inputs. They are reviewed semi-annually on the quality of their decision-making process (e.g., investment memos) and their adherence to core team values, not on premature financial metrics.

Asset managers can avoid recycling old ideas by running a parallel institutional research service. The need to deliver fresh ideas to sophisticated, paying clients who challenge assumptions creates a powerful forcing function for continuous, contrarian idea generation that benefits the asset management side.

By removing the annual bonus cycle, Eagle Capital eliminates short-term performance pressure on analysts. This encourages them to focus on investment theses that play out over 3-7 years, aligning compensation with the firm's long-duration investment strategy.

To ensure the "triumph of ideas, not the triumph of seniority," Sequoia uses anonymized inputs for strategic planning and initial investment votes. This forces the team to debate the merits of an idea without being influenced by who proposed it, leveling the playing field.

Structuring compensation around a single, firm-wide P&L, rather than individual deal performance, eliminates internal competition. It forces a culture of true collaboration, as everyone's success is tied together. The system is maintained as a meritocracy by removing underperformers from the 'boat.'

Bridgewater's core advantage is its rigorous process for "compounding understanding." All investment theses must be written in plain English and translated into runnable algorithms. To enforce this discipline, any idea not captured in their "secure garden" system earns zero credit or bonus, regardless of its financial success.

To manage performance despite long feedback cycles, Greylock developed an "inputs-based" model. They assess partners on 18 specific actions, like seeing 75% of competitive deals, believing that consistently strong inputs are the best predictor of long-term success.