Drawing on Charlie Munger's wisdom, investment management problems often stem from misaligned incentives. Instead of trying to change people's actions directly, leaders should redesign the incentive structure. Rational individuals will naturally align their behavior with well-constructed incentives that drive desired client outcomes.

To ensure genuine collaboration across funds, Centerbridge structures compensation so a "substantial minority" of an individual's pay comes from other areas of the firm. This economic incentive forces a firm-wide perspective and makes being "part of one team" a financial reality, not just a cultural slogan.

Eagle Capital's competitive advantage stems from a structure designed for long-term thinking. This includes a multi-decade history, long-term client relationships (avg. 10 years), and a diversified client base. This "duration" allows the firm to invest with a longer time horizon than competitors, which is a growing differentiator.

To conserve cash, especially in a downturn, founders can pay key employees 10-30% below market rate in salary. The key is to compensate for this deficit by offering double or triple the industry standard in equity. This strategy attracts top talent aligned with long-term success while keeping the company's cash burn rate low.

While bonuses tied to revenue incentivize employees to perform specific tasks, they are purely transactional. Granting stock options makes team members think holistically about the entire business's long-term health, from strategic opportunities to small cost savings, creating true psychological ownership.

Adrian Melli argues that moving from a high-fee hedge fund to a lower-fee long-only firm created an arbitrage opportunity. By applying the same rigorous research to a structure with a lower cost of capital, his team could generate superior net returns for clients, a non-consensus bet that paid off.

A study found that CEOs trained to prioritize shareholder value deliver short-term returns by suppressing employee pay. This practice drives away high-skilled workers and cripples the company's long-term outlook, all without evidence of actually increasing sales, productivity, or investment.

Structuring compensation around a single, firm-wide P&L, rather than individual deal performance, eliminates internal competition. It forces a culture of true collaboration, as everyone's success is tied together. The system is maintained as a meritocracy by removing underperformers from the 'boat.'

Employee retention now requires a customized approach beyond generic financial incentives. Effective managers must identify whether an individual is driven by work-life balance, ego-gratifying titles, or money, and then transparently tailor their role and its associated trade-offs to that primary motivator.