Conventional wisdom sees the U.S. as insulated from global shocks due to low trade shares. However, research reveals that when viewing the economy through a comprehensive network of trade, finance, and production, its exposure to international risks is significantly higher.
The move toward a less efficient, more expensive global supply chain is not a failure but a strategic correction. Over-prioritizing efficiency created a dangerous dependency on China. Diversification, while costlier in the short term, is a fundamental principle of long-term risk management.
Global demand for dollars as the reserve currency forces the U.S. to run persistent trade deficits to supply them. This strengthens the dollar and boosts import power but hollows out the domestic industrial base. A future decline in dollar demand would create a painful economic transition.
The sectors within the "American Dynamism" thesis—defense, energy, space, manufacturing—are not siloed but form an interdependent system. Strong national security requires a resilient energy grid and space-based communications, which in turn depend on domestic manufacturing and critical minerals. This holistic view is crucial for both investors and policymakers.
The US economy's perceived strength is fragile because it rests on a dangerously narrow foundation. Job growth is concentrated in healthcare, stock market gains are driven by a handful of AI giants, and business investment is similarly focused. This lack of diversification makes the economy vulnerable and fuels public anxiety.
The global economy proved more resilient than feared due to three factors: stronger institutions built after the 2008 financial crisis, the private sector's agility in absorbing shocks like tariffs, and the fact that widespread retaliatory trade wars did not fully materialize.
It's the volatility and unpredictability within the supply chain environment—rather than the magnitude of a single shock—that can dramatically amplify the inflationary effects of other events, like energy price spikes. This suggests central banks need situation-specific responses.
The economy's apparent strength is misleadingly concentrated. Growth hinges on AI-related capital expenditures and spending by the top 20% of households. This narrow base makes the economy fragile and vulnerable to a single shock in these specific areas, as there is little diversity to absorb a downturn.
Recessionary risks are higher in Canada and Europe than in the U.S. This weakness doesn't drag the U.S. down; instead, it triggers capital flight into U.S. assets for safety. This flow strengthens the dollar and reinforces the American economy, creating a cycle where U.S. strength feeds on others' fragility.
Significant deviations from baseline global economic forecasts in 2026 are expected to originate from the US. While interconnected, Europe and China are seen as unlikely to produce major upside or downside surprises, making US performance the key variable for global markets.
Globalism was highly successful, lifting millions from poverty. Its failure wasn't the concept itself, but the lack of strategic boundaries. By allowing critical supply chains (like microchips and steel) to move offshore for cost savings, nations sacrificed sovereignty and created vulnerabilities that are now causing a predictable backlash.