AI is unlikely to replace fields like radiology because of Jevons Paradox. By making scans cheaper and faster, AI increases the overall demand for scans, which in turn can increase the total number of jobs for human radiologists to manage the higher volume and complex cases.

The fear that AI will replace top artists is misplaced. The correct framing is what happens when top talent gets AI tools. A director like Steven Spielberg could potentially increase their output 20-fold for a fraction of the cost, leading to a massive increase in high-quality creative work.

Contrary to the job loss narrative, AI will increase demand for knowledge workers. By drastically lowering the cost of their output (like code or medical scans), AI expands the number of use cases and total market demand, creating more jobs for humans to prompt, interpret, and validate the AI's work.

Applying Jevons Paradox, as AI makes code (the "digital brick") cheaper and easier to produce, it doesn't reduce the need for builders. Instead, it unlocks previously uneconomical or overly complex projects, thereby increasing the overall demand for software engineers to build more ambitious things.

Counterintuitively, making a task cheaper and easier with AI doesn't just eliminate jobs; it drastically increases the overall demand for that task. Just as Excel created more accountants, AI's efficiencies will lead to an explosion in the volume of work, creating new roles and opportunities.

If AI were perfect, it would simply replace tasks. Because it is imperfect and requires nuanced interaction, it creates demand for skilled professionals who can prompt, verify, and creatively apply it. This turns AI's limitations into a tool that requires and rewards human proficiency.

Like AI coding assistants for engineers, tools like Hera will not eliminate motion designers. Instead, they automate tedious 'pixel-by-pixel' execution. This frees designers to focus on high-level creativity, strategy, and overall vision, shifting their role from pure execution to creative direction.

AI's ability to automate complex creative tasks like 3D rendering won't eliminate jobs for motion designers. Instead, it creates a Jevons Paradox: as rendering becomes cheaper and more accessible, the overall volume of rendered content will explode, ultimately increasing the demand for skilled experts who can refine AI outputs and manage complex projects.

AI tools make software development drastically cheaper. Rather than replacing engineers, this efficiency will likely trigger the Jevons paradox: the unlocked demand for new, more powerful software will skyrocket, increasing the overall need for people who can direct these new capabilities.