Svedka's fully AI-generated ad was widely panned as one of the worst ever, feeling generic and soulless. In contrast, Flexport's AI-generated ad was praised for its clever script and classic Super Bowl feel. This proves that AI is a tool; the success of creative work still hinges on a strong, human-led idea and thoughtful execution, not just the novelty of the technology used.
Related Insights
As more teams use AI, campaign strategies become homogenized because AI suggests traditional plays based on existing data. The key differentiator becomes human oversight, where marketers add unique, creative insights to AI-generated foundations, ensuring campaigns stand out.
Generative AI is a powerful tool for accelerating the production and refinement of creative work, but it cannot replace human taste or generate a truly compelling core idea. The most effective use of AI is as a partner to execute a pre-existing, human-driven concept, not as the source of the idea itself.
Svedka Vodka's Super Bowl ad, promoted as the "first AI-generated" one, was widely panned. The insight is that being first with a new technology is not enough; without a strong creative concept, it can backfire. The ad was perceived as a gimmick rather than an innovative use of AI.
AI in creative doesn't have to dilute a brand. Coca-Cola's successful holiday ad used AI, but its high brand recall (83%) was driven by focusing on iconic assets like Santa. The AI execution was effective because it was largely invisible, proving the creative idea still drives the ad, not the tech.
Higgsfield's CEO notes a key trend: the best-performing AI-generated ads don't try to pass as real. They lean into a distinct AI aesthetic, suggesting that audiences are not only accepting but are also engaged by this new visual style, prioritizing creativity over photorealism.
Flexport CEO Ryan Peterson created a compelling, fully AI-generated Super Bowl-style ad without buying airtime. This demonstrates that agencies will soon need to produce complete AI-generated V1 ads for client pitches, moving beyond simple scripts or storyboards to showcase concepts more vividly and efficiently.
While OpenAI and Anthropic ran abstract, niche, or philosophical ads, Google demonstrated a tangible, heartwarming use case for its AI (planning a room remodel). For a mainstream Super Bowl audience unfamiliar with the technology, showing a simple, delightful product experience is far more effective than trying to explain complex concepts or engage in industry inside jokes.
While AI video tools can generate visually interesting ads cheaply and capture views, they currently lack the authentic creative spark needed for true brand building. Their value lies in quick, low-cost content, making them a performance marketing tool rather than an asset for creating a lasting, memorable brand identity.
As AI tools become commoditized, the exponential differentiator for marketing success will be subjective taste. Teams must double down on unscalable, creative elements that AI cannot replicate, as this is what will truly stand out and build a memorable brand.
AI tools are best used as collaborators for brainstorming or refining ideas. Relying on AI for final output without a "human in the loop" results in obviously robotic content that hurts the brand. A marketer's taste and judgment remain the most critical components.
