Relying on one lead source, revenue stream, or indispensable team member creates critical vulnerabilities. Businesses must mitigate these dependencies to survive shocks, adopting the Navy SEALs' mindset: "two is one and one is none." This applies to technology access and key suppliers as well.
Related Insights
Most founders worry about a single client representing too much revenue, but the same "concentration risk" applies to lead sources. If one channel (e.g., Instagram) generates over 40% of your leads, your business is vulnerable. Diversification makes you safer and more valuable to buyers.
While specialization allows for premium pricing, it creates extreme dependency on a narrow market. If the niche shrinks due to technological shifts or even a negative social media trend, the specialist's entire business is at existential risk with little ability to pivot.
Startups pursuing an enterprise model face extreme external risks. After months of work, Sure's pivotal first B2B launch partner went out of business just one week before the go-live date. This highlights the fragility of relying on a single large partner and the resilience required to overcome setbacks outside your control.
When an owner acts as the primary problem-solver, the business cannot scale beyond their personal capacity. This over-functioning creates an operational bottleneck that prevents growth, duplicates effort, and ultimately erodes profitability by making the business dependent on one person.
An outage at a single dominant cloud provider like AWS can cripple a third of the internet, including competitors' services. This highlights how infrastructure centralization creates systemic vulnerabilities that ripple across the entire digital economy, demanding a new approach to redundancy and regulation.
Businesses building their entire model on leads from a single platform like Google or Facebook Ads are at severe risk. An algorithm change can instantly destroy their customer source, highlighting the need for a diversified, systems-based marketing approach rather than tactical dependency.
While bootstrapping, Shure's founders secured a large anchor customer, a sound wedge strategy. However, the customer's unexpected death completely derailed their progress, highlighting the extreme risk of building a fledgling company around a single point of failure.
Hormozi's team didn't just plan for success; they systematically identified every potential point of failure ("choke points") from ad platforms to payment processors. By asking "how would we fail?" and creating contingencies for each scenario, they proactively managed risk for a complex, high-stakes event.
An event manager, solely responsible for all logistics for 30 events in three weeks, made a major booking error. This demonstrates that assigning high-volume, complex projects to a single person without support turns them into a single point of failure, making critical mistakes almost unavoidable.
To mitigate client concentration risk, the quantity of relationships you maintain within a single customer account must be directly proportional to the revenue it generates. Relying on one or two contacts is a critical failure point, especially during leadership changes, transforming generic advice into a specific, quantifiable strategy for account security.
