Rogers argues that Gawker's aesthetic of "snark" and its click-driven, short-form polemical model served as a petri dish. When this model merged with the social justice focus of young journalists in the Obama era, it created the dominant "woke" media culture.
Related Insights
Podcast host Ben Smith posits that there was an asymmetry in media consumption, with conservatives closely following left-leaning outlets like Gawker. This gave them deep insights into their ideological opponents, while many on the left remained unaware of the right's media ecosystem.
A fringe element of the political right is beginning to mirror the 'woke left' by adopting similar tactics. This includes a focus on identity-based victimhood narratives and a preference for destroying and deplatforming opponents rather than engaging them in genuine debate.
Andreessen pinpoints a post-2015 'gravity inversion' where journalists, once defenders of free speech, began aggressively demanding more content censorship from tech platforms like Facebook. This marked a fundamental, hostile shift in the media landscape.
John McWhorter argues that while the "peak woke" moment in general society has passed, the ideology has become so deeply rooted in academia and the arts that it's likely "ruined for the duration." The core tenets are passed down through graduate programs and hiring practices, making them difficult to dislodge.
A/B testing on platforms like YouTube reveals a clear trend: the more incendiary and negative the language in titles and headlines, the more clicks they generate. This profit incentive drives the proliferation of outrage-based content, with inflammatory headlines reportedly up 140%.
Fearing Gawker's notoriously harsh commenters would dissect her wedding, Sarah Rogers created multiple anonymous accounts. She planned to use these "sock puppets" to post positive comments and defend herself, viewing it as a personal public diplomacy tactic to manage a hostile information environment.
The new iteration of "woke" is less about confrontation and more about subtle integration into mainstream culture. It makes progressive ideas palatable to a wider audience, achieving cultural penetration without triggering a culture war, a trend dubbed the "evolution of woke."
The 20th-century broadcast economy monetized aspiration and sex appeal to sell products. Today's algorithm-driven digital economy has discovered that rage is a far more potent and profitable tool for capturing attention and maximizing engagement.
The common mantra 'go woke, go broke' is backward. US media revenue cratered 75% due to the internet's rise. This financial brokenness forced extreme message discipline ('wokeness') as a desperate survival strategy to retain jobs and a shrinking audience base. Financial collapse preceded the ideological shift.
The promise of new media was to foster deep, nuanced conversations that legacy outlets abandoned. However, it is increasingly falling into the same traps: becoming predictable, obsessed with personality feuds, and chasing clicks with inflammatory content instead of pursuing truth.