In the Cartitude 1 trial, the strongest predictor of long-term remission with Siltacel was a lower burden of disease (measured by bone marrow percentage and soluble BCMA levels), rather than the number of prior treatments. This implies using CAR-T therapy earlier in the disease course is more effective.

The confirmatory Code Break 200 study for sotorasib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) over docetaxel. However, it failed to show a similar benefit in overall survival (OS), a critical distinction for oncologists weighing long-term patient outcomes.

For HER2+ biliary tract cancer patients with hyperbilirubinemia where stenting isn't possible, zanidatumab is a preferable option over TDXD. Zanidatumab lacks significant hepatotoxicity, whereas TDXD's irinotecan-like payload poses a risk in patients with moderate hepatic impairment.

Kaplan-Meier curves from the VICTORIA-1 trial show a steep, immediate drop-off for patients on fulvestrant monotherapy, with ~60% progressing quickly. In contrast, the giredestrant combination arms show a much flatter initial curve, visually demonstrating that a primary benefit is protecting the large subset of patients who would otherwise fail therapy very early.

A patient's time to progression on first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy acts as an informal biomarker. A shorter duration, such as 14 months, is viewed by experts as "not so great" and indicates a degree of underlying endocrine resistance that influences subsequent treatment strategies.

In neoadjuvant therapy, a patient's long-term outcome is better predicted by stopping tumor DNA shedding (ctDNA clearance) than by achieving pathologic complete response (pCR), the traditional gold standard. This redefines what constitutes a successful treatment response before surgery.

The InVigor11 study was the first to show that detecting recurrence via a ctDNA test before it's visible on scans is not just a prognostic sign, but an actionable clinical state. Intervening with therapy at this early stage was proven to improve patient outcomes, establishing a new paradigm for cancer surveillance.

An overall survival (OS) benefit in an adjuvant trial may not be meaningful for patients in systems (e.g., the U.S.) with guaranteed access to the same effective immunotherapy upon recurrence. The crucial, unanswered question is whether treating micrometastatic disease is inherently superior to treating macroscopic disease later, a distinction current trial data doesn't clarify.

The effectiveness of modern daratumab-based therapies has significantly improved patient outcomes. This positive development paradoxically made previous staging systems, founded in eras with less effective treatments, unable to accurately identify the highest-risk patients, necessitating the creation of a new prognostic model for the current era.