Get your free personalized podcast brief
We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
When politics becomes a tribal conflict where the opposing side is seen as an existential threat, supporters are conditioned to disbelieve any negative information about their own leaders. This tribal loyalty effectively exonerates leaders from accountability for unethical actions.
Related Insights
A toxic, symbiotic relationship exists between GOP voters, right-wing media, and elected officials. Each element reinforces the others, creating an incentive structure where politicians and media figures must cater to the base's appetite for Trumpism to survive, regardless of their personal beliefs.
People are more infuriated by hypocrisy than by open corruption. Because a figure like Trump doesn't pretend to adhere to any ethical norms, he can't be accused of being a hypocrite. This blatant shamelessness acts as a shield, making traditional attacks based on norm violations ineffective.
People online don't evaluate political statements for factual accuracy. Instead, they use an "us vs. them" filter. If the speaker is on their team, the statement is good; if they're on the other team, it's bad, regardless of content or logic.
Political parties now adopt positions primarily to oppose their rivals, rather than from consistent principles. This is seen in the multiple reversals on COVID-19 policies and vaccines. When beliefs flip-flop based on the opponent's stance, the driving force is tribalism, not ideology.
In a populist era, your reaction to negative news about your own "team" reveals your moral standing. If your first instinct is to discredit the person who discovered fraud rather than address the fraud itself, you have succumbed to tribalism over principle.
Political parties socialize well-intentioned individuals into a system of professionalized groupthink. The pressures of party loyalty, gaining power, and maintaining a united front lead politicians to engage in acts they would consider immoral on their own, such as lying or supporting policies they disagree with. This habitualized behavior is a core flaw of party politics.
To hold leaders accountable, a nation must agree on a core set of values. Without this shared ethos, politics devolves into tribalism where each side justifies any action, making it impossible to remove a leader for violating principles that are no longer commonly held.
The public's tolerance for political corruption stems from a broader cultural shift mirroring an economic model where success is celebrated regardless of ethical costs. If CEOs can decimate communities for profit, politicians are seen as entitled to their rewards after winning an election.
Focusing on which political side is "crazier" misses the point. The fundamental danger is the psychological process of tribalism itself. It simplifies complex issues into "us vs. them," impairs rational thought, and inevitably leads to extremism on all sides.
The psychological engine of populism is the zero-sum fallacy. It frames every issue—trade deficits, immigration, university admissions—as a win-lose scenario. This narrative, where one group's success must come at another's expense, fosters the protectionist and resentful attitudes that populist leaders exploit.
