The NCI 9673 trial demonstrated that adding the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab to the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab did not improve response rate, PFS, or overall survival in patients with previously treated anal cancer. This finding discourages this combination approach, avoiding unnecessary toxicity.

A modern strategy for localized MSI-high gastroesophageal cancer is to begin with dual immune checkpoint blockade. Clinicians can then perform an early response assessment and pivot to chemoimmunotherapy if the initial response is suboptimal, allowing for a flexible, response-adapted approach.

When choosing between therapies for dually positive (Claudin+/PD-L1+) gastric cancer, the existence of robust five-year survival data for immunotherapy regimens provides a compelling reason to prioritize it over newer agents like zolbetuximab, which lack such long-term follow-up.

Data from the Podium-303 trial's crossover arm suggests that waiting to use a PD-1 inhibitor after progression on chemotherapy is less effective than using it concurrently from the start. This supports the synergistic effect of chemo-immunotherapy and favors the concurrent approach as the standard of care.

While the Keynote 585 trial (doublet chemo + pembrolizumab) failed overall, its small FLOT chemotherapy subgroup mirrored the positive results of the Matterhorn trial (FLOT + durvalumab). This suggests the choice of a less aggressive chemotherapy backbone, not the immunotherapy concept, was the critical factor in the trial's negative outcome.

Long-term follow-up from multiple major trials (Checkmate 649, Keynote 590) consistently demonstrates that adding a checkpoint inhibitor to first-line chemotherapy produces durable benefits. This combination more than doubles or triples the 5-year overall survival rate from ~3-5% with chemotherapy alone to over 11-13% with immunotherapy.

Experts favor a Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (NIVO+EP) combination for newly diagnosed, MSI-high, stage IV gastroesophageal cancer patients who can tolerate it. This approach avoids chemotherapy and yields high, sustained response rates, including potential for complete pathologic responses in metastatic settings.

The Matterhorn study found that adding the immunotherapy drug Durvalumab to FLOT chemotherapy significantly improved survival in localized gastric cancer. Surprisingly, this benefit extended to patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression, challenging the biomarker's predictive value for immunotherapy efficacy in this perioperative setting.

The COMET study found combining chemotherapy with atezolizumab did not improve overall survival versus atezolizumab alone. However, it nearly eliminated early progressive disease (2.8% vs. 32.4%), suggesting a critical role for patients with high tumor burden who cannot risk initial progression on monotherapy.