When officials deny events clearly captured on video, it breaks public trust more severely than standard political spin. This direct contradiction of visible reality unlocks an intense level of citizen anger that feels like a personal, deliberate gaslighting attempt.

In British Columbia, organized Indigenous groups hold significant political sway that extends beyond Indigenous issues. The provincial government consults them as a moral authority on a wide range of topics, effectively granting them powerful influence over policy and personnel decisions.

Sam Harris argues the most alarming form of political lying isn't meant to deceive but to overwhelm the public with falsehoods so audacious they defy evidence. This strategy aims to create a "mass hallucination" by bludgeoning audiences with lies rather than making a believable argument.

Simply stating that conventional wisdom is wrong is a weak "gotcha" tactic. A more robust approach involves investigating the ecosystem that created the belief, specifically the experts who established it, and identifying their incentives or biases, which often reveals why flawed wisdom persists.

A massive information dump like the Epstein files doesn't lead to a unified truth. Instead, it causes society to fragment into dozens of competing narratives, with individuals choosing the version that best aligns with their pre-existing beliefs, deepening polarization.

The Minnesota fraud was primarily committed by a specific immigrant community. According to Shirley, locals and officials were hesitant to speak out for years due to a climate of political correctness, fearing they would be labeled racist or xenophobic. This fear effectively shielded the criminal activity from scrutiny.

In a populist era, your reaction to negative news about your own "team" reveals your moral standing. If your first instinct is to discredit the person who discovered fraud rather than address the fraud itself, you have succumbed to tribalism over principle.

The historian's primary value is not merely recounting events but actively questioning and disrupting established narratives. This intellectual function is vital for protecting the public from misinformation and keeping society grounded in reality, preventing it from listening to lies.

The human brain resists ambiguity and seeks closure. When a significant, factual event occurs but is followed by a lack of official information (often for legitimate investigative reasons), this creates an "open loop." People will naturally invent narratives to fill that void, giving rise to conspiracy theories.