With three-quarters of mental health providers being women, the field may have a significant blind spot regarding male issues. This gender imbalance can make it difficult for men to feel seen and heard, creating a structural barrier to effective treatment that goes beyond social stigma and pushes them towards toxic online communities.

When raising boys, a father's actions are far more impactful than his words. Instead of lecturing on what it means to be a man, consistently demonstrating service, respect, and responsibility will be internalized by a son over time, even if the lesson isn't explicit or is initially met with embarrassment.

National service offers a structured "gap year" for boys, whose emotional maturity often lags their development. It acts as a "societal take-two," providing a second chance to mature and find direction without immediate academic or career pressures, specifically addressing a cohort in crisis.

High-profile abuse scandals have created a chilling effect, making men hesitant to mentor boys for fear of being viewed with suspicion. This understandable reticence creates a critical mentorship gap for boys, especially those without a father figure, who need positive male guidance.

Galloway posits that a significant political shift from blue to red occurred among women aged 45-64. He theorizes this is driven by mothers voting for the perceived best interest of their struggling sons or husbands, prioritizing disruptive change over other issues when their family isn't thriving.

When children become teenagers, the parenting goal shifts. Instead of immediately judging or correcting their behavior, prioritize listening without interruption. This maintains "access" to their thoughts and lives, ensuring they continue to share openly, which is a prerequisite for future guidance.

Productive conversations about men's struggles are stifled by a societal "gag reflex." This is caused by the far-right co-opting the issue with regressive solutions and the far-left reframing it as men *being* the problem, leading to immediate accusations of misogyny.

Universal childcare, typically framed as a feminist policy, could be profoundly beneficial for men. By alleviating financial stress on young families, it could reduce divorce rates. This is critical as men are significantly more prone to self-harm and negative outcomes following a divorce, making family economic stability a key men's issue.

Universal childcare is argued to be a pro-male policy. By reducing economic strain on families, a primary driver of divorce, it helps keep families intact. Given that men suffer disproportionately from post-divorce mental health crises, this reframes childcare from a “women's issue” to a critical support system for men's well-being.