We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
The end of a liquidity cycle is not typically triggered by central banks, but by the real economy. As economic activity strengthens late-cycle, it drives up commodity prices. This process acts as a tax on the system, destroying liquidity and tipping the market into turbulence.
Financial markets are not driven by the economy; the economy is downstream from markets. The liquidity cycle, representing money available to the financial sector, precedes real economic activity by 15-20 months, making it a powerful leading indicator for macro investors and asset allocators.
A strengthening real economy isn't always bullish for assets. Increased activity, inventory building, and capital expenditures raise working capital demands, pulling liquidity out of the financial system. This starves markets of needed capital, creating a liquidity crunch independent of central bank actions.
Contrary to its name, the 'speculation' phase is not a bullish signal. In Michael Howell's framework, it's the final stage before 'turbulence,' analogous to autumn before winter. This phase indicates investors should be reducing risk as a market downturn approaches, not increasing it.
Commodity supercycles are characterized by violent price spikes and crashes. This extreme volatility deters the long-term capital investment required to increase supply. Fear of another collapse prevents producers from expanding, thus ensuring the cycle of scarcity and price explosions continues.
Historical commodity supercycles are not smooth upward trends but are characterized by a series of distinct, sharp price spikes. This "bubbling cauldron" nature, driven by investor fear and subsequent underinvestment, can mislead participants into thinking the cycle is over prematurely.
The current economic cycle is unlikely to end in a classic nominal slowdown where everyone loses their jobs. Instead, the terminal risk is a resurgence of high inflation, which would prevent the Federal Reserve from providing stimulus and could trigger a 2022-style market downturn.
Asset allocation should be based on liquidity cycles, not economic cycles like GDP growth, as they are out of sync. An increase in liquidity precedes economic acceleration by 12-15 months. Strong economic data can even be a negative signal for asset markets as it means money is leaving financials for the real economy.
An oil supply shock initially appears hawkishly inflationary, prompting central banks to hold or raise rates. However, once prices cross a critical threshold (e.g., >$100/barrel), it triggers severe demand destruction and recession, forcing a rapid policy reversal towards aggressive rate cuts.
History shows a recurring 25-30 year cycle where capital starves 'old economy' sectors (energy, materials) for 'new economy' tech, leading to underinvestment. Eventually, physical shortages cause a violent rotation back into asset-heavy industries, a 'revenge of the old economy.'
The reason for the Fed's rate cuts is critical. A "good" cycle with firm growth and declining inflation leads to strong commodity returns. Conversely, a "bad" cycle with decelerating growth and sticky inflation results in negative returns, making the 'why' more important than the 'what'.