Instead of marketing and sales running separate races with siloed KPIs, a modern GTM model measures the entire journey like a relay. Both teams are measured on how efficiently accounts move through the funnel, focusing on the quality of handoffs and collaborative impact on velocity.

Related Insights

Instead of a linear handoff, the "GTM Factory" model tracks sales and marketing as parallel processes. This provides end-to-end visibility, like a manufacturing line, exposing how marketing's ongoing influence throughout the sales cycle compounds with sales activities to accelerate pipeline and improve win rates.

Most go-to-market challenges, from low conversion rates to departmental friction, can be traced to the handoff process between marketing and sales. Start your diagnosis here to find the root cause of issues like low-quality leads or poor pipeline velocity, not just the symptoms.

Most GTM systems track initial outreach and final outcomes but fail to quantify the critical journey in between. This "ginormous gray area" of engagement makes it impossible to understand which activities truly influence pipeline, leading to flawed, outcome-based decision-making instead of journey-based optimization.

Go-to-market success isn't just about high-performing marketing, sales, and CS teams. The true differentiator is the 'connective tissue'—shared ICP definitions, terminology, and smooth handoffs. This alignment across functions, where one team's actions directly impact the next, is where most organizations break down.

Misalignment stems from sales and marketing using different numbers and narratives. High-performing organizations treat GTM as a single, unified motion. They focus on seamlessly passing the customer from one stage to the next, prioritizing a collective win over defending individual functional metrics.

Ditch MQLs. For sales-led motions, measure marketing on qualified pipeline (deals converting at >25%). For PLG motions, measure 'activated signups,' where users hit their 'aha moment.' This aligns marketing with quality and revenue, not volume.

Average teams measure success in functional silos (sales vs. marketing), leading to finger-pointing. Elite teams remove functions from the equation. They focus entirely on the customer's journey, identifying patterns that lead to pipeline and fixing those that don't, regardless of which department "owns" them.

Legacy GTM models relegate marketing to top-of-funnel activities. Data shows marketing’s continued engagement *after* a deal is created significantly impacts outcomes. Deals with active marketing signals during the sales cycle close faster and at a higher rate, proving marketing is a full-funnel powerhouse.

A traditional contact-based funnel (Lead > MQL > SQL) is inadequate for B2B. Shift to an account-based funnel that maps target accounts to stages like "Awareness" or "Engaged." The primary GTM goal then becomes progressing entire accounts from one stage to the next for a more accurate view of pipeline health.

Relying on a single data point like "first touch" to explain pipeline creation is flawed. It ignores the complex buyer journey and inevitably leads to a blame game—marketing providing "shitty leads" versus sales doing "poor follow-up"—instead of a systematic analysis of what is truly broken in the process.