Duolingo's first investors admitted they didn't believe in the education market, which they considered a bad business. They invested solely because founder Luis von Ahn had a previous successful exit to Google, demonstrating that a founder's track record can be more persuasive to early VCs than the business idea itself.
Related Insights
The most successful founders, like Koenigsegg, say the same things on day one as they do 20 years later. Their success comes not from pivoting, but from the relentless, decades-long execution of a single, powerful vision. This unwavering consistency compounds into a massive competitive advantage and defines the company's character.
Success brings knowledge, but it also creates a bias against trying unconventional ideas. Early-stage entrepreneurs are "too dumb to know it was dumb," allowing them to take random shots with high upside. Experienced founders often filter these out, potentially missing breakthroughs, fun, and valuable memories.
A16z's foundational belief is that founders, not hired "professional CEOs," should lead their companies long-term. The firm is structured as a network of specialists to provide founders with the knowledge and connections they lack, enabling them to grow into the CEO role and succeed.
The ideal founder archetype starts with deep technical expertise and product sense. They then develop exceptional business and commercial acumen over time, a rarer and more powerful combination than a non-technical founder learning the product.
![David George - Building a16z Growth, Investing Across the AI Stack, and Why Markets Misprice Growth - [Invest Like the Best, EP.450] thumbnail](https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/8da7dbd8-ceeb-11f0-941c-ef83bcdd4c9f/image/d44107bc94719f78fbe91befb141073e.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&max-w=3000&max-h=3000&fit=crop&auto=format,compress)
When making early-stage investments, avoid the common pitfall of betting on just a great idea or just a great founder. A successful investment requires deep belief in both. Every time the speaker has invested with only one of the two criteria met, they have lost money. The mandate must be 'two for two.'
Founder Luis von Ahn states his biggest mistake was delaying monetization for nearly six years due to an early belief that "making money was evil." He estimates that if the company had started monetizing in year three instead of year six, it would be three years ahead of its current position today—a stark lesson for mission-driven founders.
When a friend suggested using YouTube to scale his lessons, Sal Khan initially rejected the idea as low-tech and not serious enough for education. This highlights how founders can overlook powerful, existing platforms that don't fit their preconceived notions of what their product 'should' be.
Seeing an existing successful business is validation, not a deterrent. By copying their current model, you start where they are today, bypassing their years of risky experimentation and learning. The market is large enough for multiple winners.
Venture capital should focus on what a founder does exceptionally well, rather than penalizing them for past failures or weaknesses. Ben Horowitz uses the Adam Neumann example to illustrate their principle: judge people by their spectacular talents (like building the WeWork brand) and help them manage their flaws, which is a more effective strategy than seeking perfectly flawless individuals.
